[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASoNWVxJCRneD1GFo41vw0+9oduzLq1Jep_f3ckABfA1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:19:32 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h
Hi.
2017-08-01 20:04 GMT+09:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:48 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>>> > If Linus is okay with the following proposal I would rather go with
>>>> > it,
>>>> > i.e. logical split the series to
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Fix IRQ related headers inclusion
>>>> > 2. Fix pinconf-generic.h inclusion
>>>> > 3. Fix OF headers inclusion (btw, of_gpio.h is not enough there?)
>>>>
>>>> That works fine with me, but also one big patch actually, I do not
>>>> want to make it too much work to refactor obviously incorrect things.
>>>>
>>>> As soon as we have rough consensus on this and the build robot
>>>> are happy I will apply it to GPIO and also pull it into the pinctrl
>>>> subsystem.
>>>
>>> For me priorities like this:
>>> 1) it works after the patch being applied (no regressions);
>>> 2) it makes code cleaner at the end;
>>> 3) it is presented in logically split parts.
>>>
>>> So, as long as 1) and 2) are satisfied I can neglect on 3).
>>
>> We are in violent agreement :D
>
> What I would like to say is that is up to you after all :-)
> For me looks better to split.
I will split this into sensible chunks.
As I mentioned before, linux/gpio/driver.h is included from several sub-systems,
so I need at least two development cycles to finish this task.
Maybe,
[1] Send patches to subsystems (gpio, pinctrl, etc.) for v4.14
(splitting into sensible chunks, like per-driver)
[2] Drop unneeded includes from linux/gpio/driver.h for v4.15
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists