lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a245ufEQHoR1ewJAROy8ay0r-59Et7U4utAT9ogLU-Asw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2017 13:13:12 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
> On (08/01/17 15:28), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Does this fix it? I definitely got this part wrong as I see now, we must
>> look up the 'tail' after calling __tty_buffer_request_room, not before.
>
> yes, it does. thanks!
>
> Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

Thanks for testing! I've now submitted that fix properly with a real
changelog and your Tested-by tag.

        Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ