[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87379ab27q.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 14:09:45 +0200
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>,
Omri Itach <omrii@...vell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Igal Liberman <igall@...vell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mvebu: Fix cause computation in irq handler
Hi Linus,
On lun., juil. 24 2017, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On mer., juil. 12 2017, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>> When switching to regmap, the way to compute the irq cause was
>> reorganized. However while doing it, a typo was introduced: a 'xor'
>> replaced a 'and'.
>>
>> This lead to wrong behavior in the interrupt handler ans one of the
>> symptom was wrong irq handler called on the Armada 388 GP:
>> "->handle_irq(): c016303c,
>> handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x278
>> ->irq_data.chip(): c0b0ec0c,
>> 0xc0b0ec0c
>> ->action(): (null)
>> IRQ_NOPROBE set
>> IRQ_NOREQUEST set
>> unexpected IRQ trap at vector 00
>> irq 0, desc: ee804800, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0"
>>
>> Fixes: 2233bf7a92e7 ("gpio: mvebu: switch to regmap for register access")
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Would it be possible to push this fix on the current kernel (v4.13-rc) ?
>
> Indeed currently due to this bug, the Armada 388 GP board does not boot
> anymore because this board uses a gpio interrupt. So it prevents to have
> continuous integration on this one with kci for instance.
I saw that yesterday you appplied patches on gpio/fixes but it seems
that you missed this one, because most of the patch you're applied were
actually posted after this one.
Thanks,
Gregory
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
>> index e338c3743562..45c65f805fd6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
>> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void mvebu_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> edge_cause = mvebu_gpio_read_edge_cause(mvchip);
>> edge_mask = mvebu_gpio_read_edge_mask(mvchip);
>>
>> - cause = (data_in ^ level_mask) | (edge_cause & edge_mask);
>> + cause = (data_in & level_mask) | (edge_cause & edge_mask);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < mvchip->chip.ngpio; i++) {
>> int irq;
>> --
>> 2.13.2
>>
>
> --
> Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
> Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
> development, consulting, training and support.
> http://free-electrons.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists