lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51e4468b-1c58-b95a-f5a0-07dec5825483@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:32:26 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] PCI: limit FLR wait time to 100ms maximum

On 8/2/2017 4:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I haven't worked through all the details of what 6.6.2 says, but I
> think it uses 100ms in the context of the *minimum* time software must
> wait between initiating an FLR and initializing the function

Here is what spec says in 6.6.2

"After an FLR has been initiated by writing a 1b to the Initiate Function Level Reset bit,
the Function must complete the FLR within 100 ms."

I interpret this as maximum.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ