[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710f8933-df3a-7666-f5c5-861dd9761dba@mm-sol.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:40:00 +0300
From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kishon@...com,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: smuthayy <smuthayy@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] PCI: dwc: qcom: Add support for IPQ8074 PCIe
controller
Hi,
Thanks for the patch.
On 31.07.2017 09:34, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Add support for the IPQ8074 PCIe controller. IPQ8074 supports
> Gen 1/2, one lane, two PCIe root complex with support for MSI and
> legacy interrupts, and it conforms to PCI Express Base 2.1
> specification.
>
> The core init is the similar to the existing SoC, however the
> clocks and reset lines differ.
>
> Signed-off-by: smuthayy <smuthayy@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 6525f2f..b2ea953 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,20 @@
> #include "pcie-designware.h"
>
> #define PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL 0x00
> +#define MST_WAKEUP_EN BIT(13)
> +#define SLV_WAKEUP_EN BIT(12)
> +#define MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS BIT(10)
> +#define SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS BIT(9)
> +#define CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS BIT(6)
> +#define AUX_PWR_DET BIT(4)
> +#define L23_CLK_RMV_DIS BIT(2)
> +#define L1_CLK_RMV_DIS BIT(1)
> +
> +#define PCIE20_COMMAND_STATUS 0x04
> +#define CMD_BME_VAL 0x4
> +#define PCIE20_DEVICE_CONTROL2_STATUS2 0x98
> +#define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10
> +
> #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40
> #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C
> #define PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR 0x168
> @@ -58,9 +72,22 @@
> #define CFG_BRIDGE_SB_INIT BIT(0)
>
> #define PCIE20_CAP 0x70
> +#define PCIE20_CAP_LINK_CAPABILITIES (PCIE20_CAP + 0xC)
> +#define PCIE20_CAP_LINK_1 (PCIE20_CAP + 0x14)
> +#define PCIE_CAP_LINK1_VAL 0x2fd7f
> +
> +#define PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH 0x1AC
Could you use lower-case for hex numbers, please.
> +
> +#define PCIE20_MISC_CONTROL_1_REG 0x8BC
> +#define DBI_RO_WR_EN 1
>
> #define PERST_DELAY_US 1000
>
> +#define AXI_CLK_RATE 200000000
> +
> +#define PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x358
> +#define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ 0x10000000
> +
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 {
> struct clk *iface_clk;
> struct clk *core_clk;
> @@ -110,11 +137,21 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 {
> struct reset_control *phy_ahb_reset;
> };
>
> +struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 {
> + struct clk *iface;
> + struct clk *axi_m_clk;
> + struct clk *axi_s_clk;
> + struct clk *ahb_clk;
> + struct clk *aux_clk;
> + struct reset_control *rst[7];
> +};
> +
> union qcom_pcie_resources {
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 v1_0_0;
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 v2_1_0;
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_2 v2_3_2;
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 v2_4_0;
> + struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 v2_3_3;
> };
>
> struct qcom_pcie;
> @@ -884,6 +921,206 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_4_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + int i;
> + const char *rst_names[] = {
> + "axi_m", "axi_s", "pipe",
> + "axi_m_sticky", "sticky",
> + "ahb", "sleep",
> + };
Could you indent this properly, i.e
const char *rst_names[] = { "axi_m", "axi_s", "pipe",
... };
> +
> + res->iface = devm_clk_get(dev, "iface");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->iface))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->iface);
> +
> + res->axi_m_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "axi_m");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->axi_m_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->axi_m_clk);
> +
> + res->axi_s_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "axi_s");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->axi_s_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->axi_s_clk);
> +
> + res->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ahb");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->ahb_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->ahb_clk);
> +
> + res->aux_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aux");
> + if (IS_ERR(res->aux_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->aux_clk);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rst_names); i++) {
> + res->rst[i] = devm_reset_control_get(dev, rst_names[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(res->rst[i]))
> + return PTR_ERR(res->rst[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->aux_clk);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_enable_resources_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->iface);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable core clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->axi_m_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable core clock\n");
> + goto err_clk_axi_m;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(res->axi_m_clk, AXI_CLK_RATE);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "MClk rate set failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto err_clk_axi_m;
> + }
Why you need to set the rate here, what is the default rate for this clock?
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->axi_s_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable axi slave clock\n");
> + goto err_clk_axi_s;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(res->axi_s_clk, AXI_CLK_RATE);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "MClk rate set failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto err_clk_axi_s;
> + }
Same comment as above one.
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->ahb_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable ahb clock\n");
> + goto err_clk_ahb;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->aux_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable aux clock\n");
> + goto err_clk_aux;
> + }
> +
> + udelay(1);
From where comes 1us? Please add a comment.
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_aux:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> +err_clk_ahb:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_s:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_m:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_2_3_3_reset(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++) {
> + ret = reset_control_assert(res->rst[i]);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pcie->pci->dev,
> + "%s: reset assert failed for %d\n",
> + __func__, i);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + msleep(20);
Could you explain why we need to wait for 20ms.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++) {
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(res->rst[i]);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pcie->pci->dev,
> + "%s: reset deassert failed for %d\n",
> + __func__, i);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + msleep(20);
Same comment as above.
> +
> + ret = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> + if (ret) {
> + pcie->ops->deinit(pcie);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> + val &= ~BIT(0);
> + writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> +
> + writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR);
> +
> + writel(MST_WAKEUP_EN | SLV_WAKEUP_EN | MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS
> + | SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS | CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS |
> + AUX_PWR_DET | L23_CLK_RMV_DIS | L1_CLK_RMV_DIS,
> + pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL);
> + writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH);
> +
> + writel(CMD_BME_VAL, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_COMMAND_STATUS);
> + writel(DBI_RO_WR_EN, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_MISC_CONTROL_1_REG);
> + writel(PCIE_CAP_LINK1_VAL, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_CAP_LINK_1);
> +
> + val = readl(pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_CAP_LINK_CAPABILITIES);
> + val &= ~(BIT(10) | BIT(11));
Could you add defines for those two bits?
regards,
Stan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists