lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710f8933-df3a-7666-f5c5-861dd9761dba@mm-sol.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2017 23:40:00 +0300
From:   Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
To:     Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kishon@...com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
        fengguang.wu@...el.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     smuthayy <smuthayy@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] PCI: dwc: qcom: Add support for IPQ8074 PCIe
 controller

Hi,

Thanks for the patch.

On 31.07.2017 09:34, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Add support for the IPQ8074 PCIe controller.  IPQ8074 supports
> Gen 1/2, one lane, two PCIe root complex with support for MSI and
> legacy interrupts, and it conforms to PCI Express Base 2.1
> specification.
> 
> The core init is the similar to the existing SoC, however the
> clocks and reset lines differ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: smuthayy <smuthayy@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 245 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 6525f2f..b2ea953 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,20 @@
>   #include "pcie-designware.h"
>   
>   #define PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL			0x00
> +#define MST_WAKEUP_EN				BIT(13)
> +#define SLV_WAKEUP_EN				BIT(12)
> +#define MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS			BIT(10)
> +#define SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS			BIT(9)
> +#define CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS			BIT(6)
> +#define AUX_PWR_DET				BIT(4)
> +#define L23_CLK_RMV_DIS				BIT(2)
> +#define L1_CLK_RMV_DIS				BIT(1)
> +
> +#define PCIE20_COMMAND_STATUS			0x04
> +#define CMD_BME_VAL				0x4
> +#define PCIE20_DEVICE_CONTROL2_STATUS2		0x98
> +#define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE		0x10
> +
>   #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL			0x40
>   #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK			0x4C
>   #define PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR		0x168
> @@ -58,9 +72,22 @@
>   #define CFG_BRIDGE_SB_INIT			BIT(0)
>   
>   #define PCIE20_CAP				0x70
> +#define PCIE20_CAP_LINK_CAPABILITIES		(PCIE20_CAP + 0xC)
> +#define PCIE20_CAP_LINK_1			(PCIE20_CAP + 0x14)
> +#define PCIE_CAP_LINK1_VAL			0x2fd7f
> +
> +#define PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH			0x1AC

Could you use lower-case for hex numbers, please.

> +
> +#define PCIE20_MISC_CONTROL_1_REG		0x8BC
> +#define DBI_RO_WR_EN				1
>   
>   #define PERST_DELAY_US				1000
>   
> +#define AXI_CLK_RATE				200000000
> +
> +#define PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE	0x358
> +#define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ                       0x10000000
> +
>   struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 {
>   	struct clk *iface_clk;
>   	struct clk *core_clk;
> @@ -110,11 +137,21 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 {
>   	struct reset_control *phy_ahb_reset;
>   };
>   
> +struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 {
> +	struct clk *iface;
> +	struct clk *axi_m_clk;
> +	struct clk *axi_s_clk;
> +	struct clk *ahb_clk;
> +	struct clk *aux_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *rst[7];
> +};
> +
>   union qcom_pcie_resources {
>   	struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 v1_0_0;
>   	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 v2_1_0;
>   	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_2 v2_3_2;
>   	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_4_0 v2_4_0;
> +	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 v2_3_3;
>   };
>   
>   struct qcom_pcie;
> @@ -884,6 +921,206 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_4_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +	int i;
> +	const char *rst_names[] = {
> +					"axi_m", "axi_s", "pipe",
> +					"axi_m_sticky", "sticky",
> +					"ahb", "sleep",
> +				};

Could you indent this properly, i.e

const char *rst_names[] = { "axi_m", "axi_s", "pipe",
			   ... };

> +
> +	res->iface = devm_clk_get(dev, "iface");
> +	if (IS_ERR(res->iface))
> +		return PTR_ERR(res->iface);
> +
> +	res->axi_m_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "axi_m");
> +	if (IS_ERR(res->axi_m_clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(res->axi_m_clk);
> +
> +	res->axi_s_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "axi_s");
> +	if (IS_ERR(res->axi_s_clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(res->axi_s_clk);
> +
> +	res->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ahb");
> +	if (IS_ERR(res->ahb_clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(res->ahb_clk);
> +
> +	res->aux_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aux");
> +	if (IS_ERR(res->aux_clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(res->aux_clk);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rst_names); i++) {
> +		res->rst[i] = devm_reset_control_get(dev, rst_names[i]);
> +		if (IS_ERR(res->rst[i]))
> +			return PTR_ERR(res->rst[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> +
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->aux_clk);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_enable_resources_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->iface);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable core clock\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->axi_m_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable core clock\n");
> +		goto err_clk_axi_m;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_set_rate(res->axi_m_clk, AXI_CLK_RATE);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "MClk rate set failed (%d)\n", ret);
> +		goto err_clk_axi_m;
> +	}

Why you need to set the rate here, what is the default rate for this clock?

> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->axi_s_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable axi slave clock\n");
> +		goto err_clk_axi_s;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_set_rate(res->axi_s_clk, AXI_CLK_RATE);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "MClk rate set failed (%d)\n", ret);
> +		goto err_clk_axi_s;
> +	}

Same comment as above one.

> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->ahb_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable ahb clock\n");
> +		goto err_clk_ahb;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(res->aux_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot prepare/enable aux clock\n");
> +		goto err_clk_aux;
> +	}
> +
> +	udelay(1);

 From where comes 1us? Please add a comment.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_aux:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> +err_clk_ahb:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_s:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_m:
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_2_3_3_reset(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++) {
> +		ret = reset_control_assert(res->rst[i]);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(pcie->pci->dev,
> +				"%s: reset assert failed for %d\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	msleep(20);

Could you explain why we need to wait for 20ms.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++) {
> +		ret = reset_control_deassert(res->rst[i]);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(pcie->pci->dev,
> +				"%s: reset deassert failed for %d\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	msleep(20);

Same comment as above.

> +
> +	ret = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pcie->ops->deinit(pcie);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = readl(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> +	val &= ~BIT(0);
> +	writel(val, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> +
> +	writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_DBI_BASE_ADDR);
> +
> +	writel(MST_WAKEUP_EN | SLV_WAKEUP_EN | MSTR_ACLK_CGC_DIS
> +		| SLV_ACLK_CGC_DIS | CORE_CLK_CGC_DIS |
> +		AUX_PWR_DET | L23_CLK_RMV_DIS | L1_CLK_RMV_DIS,
> +		pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_SYS_CTRL);
> +	writel(0, pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_Q2A_FLUSH);
> +
> +	writel(CMD_BME_VAL, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_COMMAND_STATUS);
> +	writel(DBI_RO_WR_EN, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_MISC_CONTROL_1_REG);
> +	writel(PCIE_CAP_LINK1_VAL, pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_CAP_LINK_1);
> +
> +	val = readl(pci->dbi_base + PCIE20_CAP_LINK_CAPABILITIES);
> +	val &= ~(BIT(10) | BIT(11));

Could you add defines for those two bits?

regards,
Stan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ