| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:59:26 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Zha, Qipeng" <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"andy@...radead.org" <andy@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"sathyaosid@...il.com" <sathyaosid@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 3/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use MFD framework to
create dependent devices
On 08/01/2017 10:14 PM, Chakravarty, Souvik K wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: platform-driver-x86-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:platform-driver-
>> x86-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>> sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 11:44 PM
>> To: x86@...nel.org; mingo@...hat.com; Zha, Qipeng
>> <qipeng.zha@...el.com>; hpa@...or.com; dvhart@...radead.org;
>> tglx@...utronix.de; andy@...radead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
>> sathyaosid@...il.com; Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>> Subject: [RFC v1 3/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use MFD framework to
>> create dependent devices
>>
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Currently, we have lot of repetitive code in dependent device resource
>> allocation and device creation handling code. This logic can be improved if
>> we use MFD framework for dependent device creation. This patch adds this
>> support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 376 +++++++++++++-------------------
>> ---
>> 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 235 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> index ad0416e..43533ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>> #include <linux/suspend.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h>
>>
>> @@ -105,8 +106,6 @@
>> #define TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE 240
>> #define TELEM_PMC_SSRAM_OFFSET 0x1B00
>> #define TELEM_PUNIT_SSRAM_OFFSET 0x1A00
>> -#define TCO_PMC_OFFSET 0x8
>> -#define TCO_PMC_SIZE 0x4
>>
>> /* PMC register bit definitions */
>>
>> @@ -115,6 +114,13 @@
>> #define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_EN (1 << 4)
>> #define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_DIS (0 << 4)
>>
>> +enum {
>> + PMC_IPC_PUNIT_MFD_BLOCK,
>> + PMC_IPC_WATCHDOG_MFD_BLOCK,
>> + PMC_IPC_TELEMETRY_MFD_BLOCK,
>> + PMC_IPC_MAX_MFD_BLOCK
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct intel_pmc_ipc_dev {
>> struct device *dev;
>> void __iomem *ipc_base;
>> @@ -123,25 +129,12 @@ static struct intel_pmc_ipc_dev {
>> int cmd;
>> struct completion cmd_complete;
>>
>> - /* The following PMC BARs share the same ACPI device with the IPC
>> */
>> - resource_size_t acpi_io_base;
>> - int acpi_io_size;
>> - struct platform_device *tco_dev;
>> -
>> /* gcr */
>> void __iomem *gcr_mem_base;
>> bool has_gcr_regs;
>>
>> - /* punit */
>> - struct platform_device *punit_dev;
>> -
>> /* Telemetry */
>> - resource_size_t telem_pmc_ssram_base;
>> - resource_size_t telem_punit_ssram_base;
>> - int telem_pmc_ssram_size;
>> - int telem_punit_ssram_size;
>> u8 telem_res_inval;
>> - struct platform_device *telemetry_dev;
>> } ipcdev;
>>
>> static char *ipc_err_sources[] = {
>> @@ -613,7 +606,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group intel_ipc_group
>> = {
>> .attrs = intel_ipc_attrs,
>> };
>>
>> -static struct resource punit_res_array[] = {
>> +static struct resource punit_ipc_resources[] = {
>> /* Punit BIOS */
>> {
>> .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> @@ -637,10 +630,7 @@ static struct resource punit_res_array[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -#define TCO_RESOURCE_ACPI_IO 0
>> -#define TCO_RESOURCE_SMI_EN_IO 1
>> -#define TCO_RESOURCE_GCR_MEM 2
>> -static struct resource tco_res[] = {
>> +static struct resource watchdog_ipc_resources[] = {
>> /* ACPI - TCO */
>> {
>> .flags = IORESOURCE_IO,
>> @@ -658,9 +648,7 @@ static struct itco_wdt_platform_data tco_info = {
>> .update_no_reboot_bit = update_no_reboot_bit, };
>>
>> -#define TELEMETRY_RESOURCE_PUNIT_SSRAM 0
>> -#define TELEMETRY_RESOURCE_PMC_SSRAM 1
>> -static struct resource telemetry_res[] = {
>> +static struct resource telemetry_ipc_resources[] = {
>> /*Telemetry*/
>> {
>> .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> @@ -670,224 +658,152 @@ static struct resource telemetry_res[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -static int ipc_create_punit_device(void) -{
>> - struct platform_device *pdev;
>> - const struct platform_device_info pdevinfo = {
>> - .parent = ipcdev.dev,
>> - .name = PUNIT_DEVICE_NAME,
>> - .id = -1,
>> - .res = punit_res_array,
>> - .num_res = ARRAY_SIZE(punit_res_array),
>> - };
>> -
>> - pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
>> - if (IS_ERR(pdev))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pdev);
>> -
>> - ipcdev.punit_dev = pdev;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int ipc_create_tco_device(void)
>> -{
>> - struct platform_device *pdev;
>> - struct resource *res;
>> - const struct platform_device_info pdevinfo = {
>> - .parent = ipcdev.dev,
>> - .name = TCO_DEVICE_NAME,
>> - .id = -1,
>> - .res = tco_res,
>> - .num_res = ARRAY_SIZE(tco_res),
>> - .data = &tco_info,
>> - .size_data = sizeof(tco_info),
>> - };
>> -
>> - res = tco_res + TCO_RESOURCE_ACPI_IO;
>> - res->start = ipcdev.acpi_io_base + TCO_BASE_OFFSET;
>> - res->end = res->start + TCO_REGS_SIZE - 1;
>> -
>> - res = tco_res + TCO_RESOURCE_SMI_EN_IO;
>> - res->start = ipcdev.acpi_io_base + SMI_EN_OFFSET;
>> - res->end = res->start + SMI_EN_SIZE - 1;
>> -
>> - pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
>> - if (IS_ERR(pdev))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pdev);
>> -
>> - ipcdev.tco_dev = pdev;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int ipc_create_telemetry_device(void) -{
>> - struct platform_device *pdev;
>> - struct resource *res;
>> - const struct platform_device_info pdevinfo = {
>> - .parent = ipcdev.dev,
>> - .name = TELEMETRY_DEVICE_NAME,
>> - .id = -1,
>> - .res = telemetry_res,
>> - .num_res = ARRAY_SIZE(telemetry_res),
>> - };
>> -
>> - res = telemetry_res + TELEMETRY_RESOURCE_PUNIT_SSRAM;
>> - res->start = ipcdev.telem_punit_ssram_base;
>> - res->end = res->start + ipcdev.telem_punit_ssram_size - 1;
>> -
>> - res = telemetry_res + TELEMETRY_RESOURCE_PMC_SSRAM;
>> - res->start = ipcdev.telem_pmc_ssram_base;
>> - res->end = res->start + ipcdev.telem_pmc_ssram_size - 1;
>> -
>> - pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
>> - if (IS_ERR(pdev))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pdev);
>> -
>> - ipcdev.telemetry_dev = pdev;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int ipc_create_pmc_devices(void)
>> +static int ipc_create_pmc_devices(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - /* If we have ACPI based watchdog use that instead */
>> + u8 n = 0;
>> + struct mfd_cell *pmc_mfd_cells;
>> +
>> + pmc_mfd_cells = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> + (sizeof(*pmc_mfd_cells) *
>> PMC_IPC_MAX_MFD_BLOCK),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pmc_mfd_cells)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Create PUNIT IPC MFD cell */
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].name = PUNIT_DEVICE_NAME;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].id = -1;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].num_resources =
>> ARRAY_SIZE(punit_ipc_resources);
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].resources = punit_ipc_resources;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].ignore_resource_conflicts = 1;
>> + n++;
> Since it's not really a loop, cant the enum values of MFD block be used instead of 'n'? Will be more readable/intuitive.
In this case, watchdog and telemetry device creation is optional and
hence we can't use fixed index when creating mfd-cells. If one of these
devices is not available then the number of valid-mfd-cells and the
index number of individual device cell in pmc_mfd_cells array will change.
>
>> +
>> + /* If we have ACPI based watchdog use that instead, othewise
>> create
>> + * a MFD cell for iTCO watchdog*/
>> if (!acpi_has_watchdog()) {
>> - ret = ipc_create_tco_device();
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add tco platform
>> device\n");
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - ret = ipc_create_punit_device();
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(ipcdev.dev, "Failed to add punit platform
>> device\n");
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.tco_dev);
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].name = TCO_DEVICE_NAME;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].id = -1;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].platform_data = &tco_info;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].pdata_size = sizeof(tco_info);
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].num_resources =
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(watchdog_ipc_resources);
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].resources = watchdog_ipc_resources;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].ignore_resource_conflicts = 1;
>> + n++;
> Same as above.
Same as above.
>
>> }
>>
>> if (!ipcdev.telem_res_inval) {
>> - ret = ipc_create_telemetry_device();
>> - if (ret)
>> - dev_warn(ipcdev.dev,
>> - "Failed to add telemetry platform
>> device\n");
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].name = TELEMETRY_DEVICE_NAME;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].id = -1;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].num_resources =
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(telemetry_ipc_resources);
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].resources = telemetry_ipc_resources;
>> + pmc_mfd_cells[n].ignore_resource_conflicts = 1;
>> + n++;
> Same as above.
Same as above.
>> }
>>
>> - return ret;
>> + return devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, pmc_mfd_cells, n,
>> NULL,
>> + 0, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> static int ipc_plat_get_res(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> - struct resource *res, *punit_res;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> void __iomem *addr;
>> - int size;
>> + int mindex, pindex = 0;
>>
>> + /* Get iTCO watchdog resources */
>> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO,
>> PLAT_RESOURCE_ACPI_IO_INDEX);
>> if (!res) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get io resource\n");
>> return -ENXIO;
>> }
>> - size = resource_size(res);
>> - ipcdev.acpi_io_base = res->start;
>> - ipcdev.acpi_io_size = size;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "io res: %pR\n", res);
>> -
>> - punit_res = punit_res_array;
>> - /* This is index 0 to cover BIOS data register */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_DATA_INDEX);
>> - if (!res) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get res of punit BIOS
>> data\n");
>> - return -ENXIO;
>> - }
>> - *punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit BIOS data res: %pR\n", res);
>> -
>> - /* This is index 1 to cover BIOS interface register */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_IFACE_INDEX);
>> - if (!res) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get res of punit BIOS
>> iface\n");
>> - return -ENXIO;
>> - }
>> - *++punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit BIOS interface res: %pR\n", res);
>> -
>> - /* This is index 2 to cover ISP data register, optional */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_ISP_DATA_INDEX);
>> - ++punit_res;
>> - if (res) {
>> - *punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit ISP data res: %pR\n", res);
>> - }
>>
>> - /* This is index 3 to cover ISP interface register, optional */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_ISP_IFACE_INDEX);
>> - ++punit_res;
>> - if (res) {
>> - *punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit ISP interface res: %pR\n", res);
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* This is index 4 to cover GTD data register, optional */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_GTD_DATA_INDEX);
>> - ++punit_res;
>> - if (res) {
>> - *punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit GTD data res: %pR\n", res);
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* This is index 5 to cover GTD interface register, optional */
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_GTD_IFACE_INDEX);
>> - ++punit_res;
>> - if (res) {
>> - *punit_res = *res;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "punit GTD interface res: %pR\n",
>> res);
>> - }
>> -
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_INDEX);
>> - if (!res) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get ipc resource\n");
>> - return -ENXIO;
>> - }
>> - res->end = (res->start + PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_SIZE +
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_SIZE - 1);
>> -
>> - addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> - if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> - "PMC I/O memory remapping failed\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR(addr);
>> - }
>> -
>> - ipcdev.ipc_base = addr;
>> -
>> - ipcdev.gcr_mem_base = addr + PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ipc res: %pR\n", res);
>> -
>> - ipcdev.telem_res_inval = 0;
>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - PLAT_RESOURCE_TELEM_SSRAM_INDEX);
>> - if (!res) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get telemetry ssram
>> resource\n");
>> - ipcdev.telem_res_inval = 1;
>> - } else {
>> - ipcdev.telem_punit_ssram_base = res->start +
>> -
>> TELEM_PUNIT_SSRAM_OFFSET;
>> - ipcdev.telem_punit_ssram_size = TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE;
>> - ipcdev.telem_pmc_ssram_base = res->start +
>> -
>> TELEM_PMC_SSRAM_OFFSET;
>> - ipcdev.telem_pmc_ssram_size = TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE;
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "telemetry ssram res: %pR\n", res);
>> + watchdog_ipc_resources[0].start = res->start + TCO_BASE_OFFSET;
>> + watchdog_ipc_resources[0].end = res->start +
>> + TCO_BASE_OFFSET + TCO_REGS_SIZE - 1;
>> + watchdog_ipc_resources[1].start = res->start + SMI_EN_OFFSET;
>> + watchdog_ipc_resources[1].end = res->start +
>> + SMI_EN_OFFSET + SMI_EN_SIZE - 1;
> The 0/1 magic may be replaced with MACROS here and elsewhere.
I think I tried it first and then later removed it because the length of
few lines go over and 80.
>
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "watchdog res 0: %pR\n",
>> + &watchdog_ipc_resources[0]);
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "watchdog res 1: %pR\n",
>> + &watchdog_ipc_resources[1]);
>> +
>> + for (mindex = 0; mindex <= PLAT_RESOURCE_GTD_IFACE_INDEX;
>> mindex++) {
> Here we are relying on the fact that the GTD_IFACE_INDEX is at offset 7. It's however not by design but a side-effect of how the BIOS places the resources.
> So perhaps not a good idea to use it, since GTD_IFACE is not meant to be a terminator/max delimiter.
We can add a new macro like "#define PLAT_RESOURCE_MAX_INDEX 8" and use
it in this loop.
But, In future, If BIOS changes its resource order or removes certain
resources then it needs corresponding changes to this driver. And when
they fix that issue, they have to make sure the MAX_INDEX value is
appropriately modified.
So even using separate macro doesn't completely isolates it from BIOS
resource changes.
>
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> mindex);
>> +
>> + switch (mindex) {
>> + /* Get PUNIT resources */
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_DATA_INDEX:
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_BIOS_IFACE_INDEX:
>> + /* BIOS resources are required, so return error if not
>> + * available */
>> + if (!res) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Failed to get punit mem resource
>> %d\n",
>> + pindex);
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_ISP_DATA_INDEX:
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_ISP_IFACE_INDEX:
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_GTD_DATA_INDEX:
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_GTD_IFACE_INDEX:
>> + /* if not valid resource, skip the rest of steps */
>> + if (!res) {
>> + pindex++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + memcpy(&punit_ipc_resources[pindex], res,
>> + sizeof(*res));
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PUNIT memory res: %pR\n",
>> + &punit_ipc_resources[pindex]);
>> + pindex++;
>> + break;
>> + /* Get Telemetry resources */
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_TELEM_SSRAM_INDEX:
>> + if (!res) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Failed to get telemtry sram res\n");
>> + ipcdev.telem_res_inval = 1;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + telemetry_ipc_resources[0].start = res->start +
>> + TELEM_PUNIT_SSRAM_OFFSET;
>> + telemetry_ipc_resources[0].end = res->start +
>> + TELEM_PUNIT_SSRAM_OFFSET +
>> TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE - 1;
>> + telemetry_ipc_resources[1].start = res->start +
>> + TELEM_PMC_SSRAM_OFFSET;
>> + telemetry_ipc_resources[1].end = res->start +
>> + TELEM_PMC_SSRAM_OFFSET +
>> TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE - 1;
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "telemetry punit ssram res:
>> %pR\n",
>> + &telemetry_ipc_resources[0]);
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "telemetry pmc ssram res:
>> %pR\n",
>> + &telemetry_ipc_resources[1]);
>> + break;
>> + /* Get IPC resources */
>> + case PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_INDEX:
>> + if (!res) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Failed to get IPC resources\n");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>> + res->end = (res->start + PLAT_RESOURCE_IPC_SIZE +
>> + PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_SIZE - 1);
>> + addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "PMC I/O memory remapping
>> failed\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(addr);
>> + }
>> + ipcdev.ipc_base = addr;
>> + ipcdev.gcr_mem_base = addr +
>> PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET;
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PMC IPC resource %pR\n",
>> res);
>> + break;
>> + };
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -943,7 +859,7 @@ static int ipc_plat_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = ipc_create_pmc_devices();
>> + ret = ipc_create_pmc_devices(pdev);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create pmc devices\n");
>> return ret;
>> @@ -952,36 +868,26 @@ static int ipc_plat_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ipcdev.irq, ioc,
>> IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
>> "intel_pmc_ipc", &ipcdev)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq\n");
>> - ret = -EBUSY;
>> - goto unregister_devices;
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &intel_ipc_group);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create sysfs group %d\n",
>> ret);
>> - goto unregister_devices;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> ipcdev.has_gcr_regs = true;
>>
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -unregister_devices:
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.tco_dev);
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.punit_dev);
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.telemetry_dev);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static int ipc_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &intel_ipc_group);
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.tco_dev);
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.punit_dev);
>> - platform_device_unregister(ipcdev.telemetry_dev);
>> ipcdev.dev = NULL;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists