[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170803232524.x7a7buzpkniaxg43@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:25:24 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Alexandru Gagniuc <alex.g@...ptrum.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <ccc94453@....cybercity.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: Add vendor prefix for Adaptrum, Inc.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 04:48:28PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Alexandru,
>
> Am 29.07.2017 um 00:07 schrieb Alexandru Gagniuc:
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <alex.g@...ptrum.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Not sure why I'm CC'ed here, but it looks sane, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>
> If this patch gets respun, please add a sentence about your company to
> the commit message. I also think "dt-bindings:" is a more common prefix?
Please respin with the above and just send by itself. This can go
separately as there's no need to merge via the same tree just in the
name of satisfying checkpatch.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists