lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 03 Aug 2017 08:26:15 +0000
From:   esodnencaocrefsdv@...thats3as.com
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MikeeUSA -- Notice Bruce Perens has NO response (nor does
 Moglen). [Was: Re: GrSecurity]

Malformed ascii art saying "Don't feed the trolls"

IE: Can't attack the message, attack the man.

Because White Men Programmers simply do not know what they do not know 
and take proper, correct, legal analysis from a license attorney dealing 
with a relevant issue as "trolling".

Here's a response from another attorney:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2017-July/044040.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/29/128

Notice Bruce Perens has NO response.
Neither does Professor Moglen who apparently forgot to include a 
no-revocation clause in version 2 of the GPL when he drafted it, thus 
keeping open the possibility of any rights-holder to unilaterally recind 
their grant at any time for any reason so-long as they did not make a 
relied-upon communication to the grantee speaking otherwise.
(seemingly** completely negligent drafting of the document) (a 
no-revocation clause would atleast make it easier to claim estopple and 
prevent unilateral revocation*)

(Notice that the later edition; v3 (which linux is not licensed under) 
rectify this ommission (yes this is the main reason v3 had to be 
drafted, the patent issue is a foil))

But Bruce and Moglen are friends (and both look down on Hans Reiser; 
feeling disparagingly about his work because Hans Reiser obeyed the 
dictats of his God regarding the adulterous behavior of the wife Nina, 
and then further, Hans did not accept any other ruler/judge/power etc 
(thus rejecting the plea agreement))
thus Moglen stays silent as Bruce Perens libels me. They have their 
square glasses on, they love their civilization that raises the woman 
above the man, that makes the man a draft animal of the woman, and keeps 
the man's love: the young girl***, from him.

Bruce Perens and Professor Moglen have adopted the white man's belief 
system:
That the man is the beast upon which the woman rightly rides;
(rather than the Overlord (ba'al) of the female).

Bruce Perens, Moglen, etc look down on those who see beauty where it 
truly resides: in the young girl***.
Bruce Perens and Moglen are thus feel Superior for spurning what is 
actually good and embracing a pale shadow that seeks to collapse upon 
them.

*no guarantee however... this is an inherent right of a property 
owner... to recind unilateral grants,control his property, alienate it 
as he wished
** we do not know the requirements that the Client privately 
communicated for the drafting of the document
***( taking girl children as brides is permitted by the God under 
Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew )

Hans Reiser did nothing wrong according to the Book of the Law 
(Deuteronomy).
Still, he stays strong.
First A victim of false love
Now A prisoner of conscience.

On 2017-08-03 05:01, John Morris wrote:
> At the risk of lowering the signal to noise on this list even more, I'd
> like to note that about seven minutes before this new nym posted here 
> it
> posted the same text to the Fedora users list.  There was exactly one
> reply.  I won't spoil it, go look it up because it worked.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@...ts.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ