[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrBfQ-mNTNitcpgo1FCa1068ZzC_J4efsxmU2X6tOJgzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:02:42 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Add support for MMC controllers
On 3 August 2017 at 13:25, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 26 July 2017 at 21:45, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:09:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > This is v3 of my MMC controller support series.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> > Chen-Yu Tsai (10):
>>>> > clk: sunxi-ng: Add interface to query or configure MMC timing modes.
>>>> > clk: sunxi-ng: Add MP_MMC clocks that support MMC timing modes
>>>> > switching
>>>> > clk: sunxi-ng: a83t: Support new timing mode for mmc2 clock
>>>> > mmc: sunxi: Support controllers that can use both old and new timings
>>>> > mmc: sunxi: Support MMC DDR52 transfer mode with new timing mode
>>>> > mmc: sunxi: Add support for A83T eMMC (MMC2)
>>>>
>>>> So this series seems to be ready for inclusion, unless Ulf has further
>>>> concerns about the clk usage.
>>>>
>>>> The first mmc patch have build time dependencies on the first clk patch.
>>>> Shall we put the clk patch on a separate immutable branch for both trees
>>>> to pull? Or we could just merge everything through the mmc tree? I don't
>>>> think we'll touch this part of the sunxi-ng clk driver for the remainder
>>>> of this cycle.
>>>
>>> I guess the easiest would be for it to go through Ulf tree, unless he
>>> says otherwise of course :)
>>
>> Okay, I have picked up the series and applied it for my next branch.
>
> I guess I wasn't very clear. When I meant "everything" I meant the mmc
> and clk patches. We will take the dts patches through the sunxi tree.
>
> Can you drop the four dts patches from your tree? That would be the
> last four patches on mmc/next at the moment.
Done!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists