[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <179e5832-0dca-0b5f-b303-d5de18353f5e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:41:04 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rkrcmar@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1
hypervisor
On 03/08/2017 13:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> + /* AD, if set, should be supported */
>> + if ((address & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT)) {
>> + if (!enable_ept_ad_bits)
>> + return false;
> In theory (I guess) we would have to check here if
> (vmx->nested.nested_vmx_ept_caps & VMX_EPT_AD_BIT)
Yes, that's a more correct check than enable_ept_ad_bits.
>>
>> + page = nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->eptp_list_address);
>> + if (!page)
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + l1_eptp_list = kmap(page);
>> + address = l1_eptp_list[index];
>> + accessed_dirty = !!(address & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT);
>
> Minor nit: Can't you directly do
>
> kunmap(page);
> nested_release_page_clean(page);
>
> at this point?
>
> We can fix this up later.
You actually can do simply kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page(vcpu,
vmcs12->eptp_list_address >> PAGE_SHIFT, &address, index * 8, 8).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists