[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170803134401.GG15018@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:44:01 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Compatibles for i2c muxes nxp,pca954x and ti,tca954x
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 12:00:27PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Texas has apparently made copies for some of the NXP devices
> handled by the drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c driver.
This happens a lot in the i2c space. Look at all the at24 EEPROM
clones. Yet they all use the same compatible string.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists