linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: multitouch: Support Asus T304UA media keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:21:15 -0700
From:   João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux@...lessm.com,
        João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: multitouch: Support Asus T304UA media keys

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay. I was at GUADEC the whole past week and couldn't
>> get much kernel work done. I was thinking a little bit about this series
>> though. Patch 1 is fine, but patch 2 is a little bit more of an issue.
>> Ideally, I'd like to keep hid-multitouch from having too many vendor
>> specific code, but it looks like this is the easier way to handle things
>> here.
>>
>> I guess the proper way of solving this situation would be to merge the
>> generic windows 8 code from hid-multitouch into hid-input so that other
>> drivers can benefit from it, but this is going to be a lot of work and
>> -ETIME.
>
> Yes, I actually have this on the list of things I'd eventually like to
> look into one day ... but we shouldn't let this block any further
> development.
>
> I have applied the series now to for-4.14/multitouch (fixing up the
> 0xff310076 -> HID_VD_ASUS_CUSTOM_MEDIA_KEYS constant in the condition as a
> followup).
>

Thanks!

--
João Paulo Rechi Vita
http://about.me/jprvita