linux-kernel - Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1708031828430.21881@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:29:11 +0100 (BST)
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix minor typos in
 comments


> Fix minor typos in comments.

Acked-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> index 8ed24ec1255d..7a1133661a65 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int ll_lookup_it_finish(struct ptlrpc_request *request,
>  	*de = alias;
>  
>  	if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_LOOKUP_NEG)) {
> -		/* we have lookup look - unhide dentry */
> +		/* We have the "lookup" lock, so unhide dentry */
>  		if (bits & MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP)
>  			d_lustre_revalidate(*de);
>  	} else if (!it_disposition(it, DISP_OPEN_CREATE)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
> index 3eb66cea65db..ae97c6f1aeb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
>   * If we're performing a creation, that means that unless the creation
>   * failed with EEXIST, we should fake up a negative dentry.
>   *
> - * For everything else, we want to lookup to succeed.
> + * For everything else, we want the lookup to succeed.
>   *
>   * One additional note: if CREATE or OPEN succeeded, we add an extra
>   * reference to the request because we need to keep it around until
> @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ int mdc_revalidate_lock(struct obd_export *exp, struct lookup_intent *it,
>   * exactly what it_status refers to.
>   *
>   * If DISP_OPEN_OPEN is set, then it_status refers to the open() call,
> - * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it status is the
> + * otherwise if DISP_OPEN_CREATE is set, then it_status is the
>   * creation failure mode.  In either case, one of DISP_LOOKUP_NEG or
>   * DISP_LOOKUP_POS will be set, indicating whether the child lookup
>   * was successful.
> -- 
> 2.12.2
> 
>