[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a40c590-68fc-0e49-a08a-64a3e46b8950@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:37:52 +0300
From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/29] drm/tilcdc: switch to drm_*{get,put} helpers
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
On 08/03/17 18:42, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/03/17 14:58, Cihangir Akturk wrote:
>>> drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
>>> compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be
>>> used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use
>>> the new APIs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
>>
>> This appears to be a part of a larger series. So I guess it will go in
>> via drm-misc. But if this is not the case just let me know and I'll add
>> this to my next pull request.
> Only if you join drm-misc and push it there yourself :-)
>
> In general I prefer driver maintainers pick up their stuff for patch
> series which don't have depencies like this here, otherwise, why
> exactly do we have driver maintainers.
>
I assumed that the series would deprecate drm_framebuffer_unreference()
and -reference() aliases (if we are cleaning things up, why wouldn't we
go all the way?). But if that is not the case, then by all means I'll
pick the patch for a 4.14 tilcdc pull request.
Cheers,
Jyri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists