| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f425b652-2bc0-e273-f3d6-107ed585c490@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:08:52 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/5] net: dsa: lan9303: Change
lan9303_xxx_packet_processing() port param.
On 08/03/2017 02:45 AM, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
> lan9303_enable_packet_processing, lan9303_disable_packet_processing()
> Pass port number (0,1,2) as parameter instead of port offset.
> Because other functions in the module pass port numbers.
> And to enable simplifications in following patch.
>
> Introduce lan9303_write_switch_port().
>
> Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> index 8e430d1ee297..fa19e320c5a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> @@ -159,9 +159,7 @@
> # define LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT1 (BIT(9) | BIT(8))
> # define LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT0 (BIT(1) | BIT(0))
>
> -#define LAN9303_PORT_0_OFFSET 0x400
> -#define LAN9303_PORT_1_OFFSET 0x800
> -#define LAN9303_PORT_2_OFFSET 0xc00
> +#define LAN9303_SWITCH_PORT_REG(port, reg0) (0x400 * (port) + (reg0))
>
> /* the built-in PHYs are of type LAN911X */
> #define MII_LAN911X_SPECIAL_MODES 0x12
> @@ -428,6 +426,13 @@ static int lan9303_read_switch_reg(struct lan9303 *chip, u16 regnum, u32 *val)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int lan9303_write_switch_port(
> + struct lan9303 *chip, int port, u16 regnum, u32 val)
> +{
> + return lan9303_write_switch_reg(
> + chip, LAN9303_SWITCH_PORT_REG(port, regnum), val);
> +}
This argument alignment is not looking too good, can you do this instead:
static int lan9303_write_switch_port(struct lan9303 *chip, int port
u16 regnum, u32 *val)
{
}
This applied to patch 5 as well (which should have included it applies
to patch 1 as well).
With that:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> +
> static int lan9303_detect_phy_setup(struct lan9303 *chip)
> {
> int reg;
> @@ -458,24 +463,23 @@ static int lan9303_detect_phy_setup(struct lan9303 *chip)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#define LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_OFFS (LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_0 - LAN9303_PORT_0_OFFSET)
> -#define LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_OFFS (LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0 - LAN9303_PORT_0_OFFSET)
> -
> static int lan9303_disable_packet_processing(struct lan9303 *chip,
> unsigned int port)
> {
> int ret;
>
> /* disable RX, but keep register reset default values else */
> - ret = lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_OFFS + port,
> - LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_REJECT_MAC_TYPES);
> + ret = lan9303_write_switch_port(
> + chip, port, LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_0,
> + LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_REJECT_MAC_TYPES);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> /* disable TX, but keep register reset default values else */
> - return lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_OFFS + port,
> - LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_IFG_CONFIG_DEFAULT |
> - LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_PAD_ENABLE);
> + return lan9303_write_switch_port(
> + chip, port, LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0,
> + LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_IFG_CONFIG_DEFAULT |
> + LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_PAD_ENABLE);
Same here, please don't re-align the arguments, they were fine already.
> }
>
> static int lan9303_enable_packet_processing(struct lan9303 *chip,
> @@ -484,17 +488,19 @@ static int lan9303_enable_packet_processing(struct lan9303 *chip,
> int ret;
>
> /* enable RX and keep register reset default values else */
> - ret = lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_OFFS + port,
> - LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_REJECT_MAC_TYPES |
> - LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_RX_ENABLE);
> + ret = lan9303_write_switch_port(
> + chip, port, LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_0,
> + LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_REJECT_MAC_TYPES |
> + LAN9303_MAC_RX_CFG_X_RX_ENABLE);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> /* enable TX and keep register reset default values else */
> - return lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_OFFS + port,
> - LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_IFG_CONFIG_DEFAULT |
> - LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_PAD_ENABLE |
> - LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_ENABLE);
> + return lan9303_write_switch_port(
> + chip, port, LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0,
> + LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_IFG_CONFIG_DEFAULT |
> + LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_PAD_ENABLE |
> + LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_X_TX_ENABLE);
> }
>
> /* We want a special working switch:
> @@ -558,13 +564,13 @@ static int lan9303_disable_processing(struct lan9303 *chip)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_0_OFFSET);
> + ret = lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, 0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - ret = lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_1_OFFSET);
> + ret = lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, 1);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - return lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_2_OFFSET);
> + return lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, 2);
> }
>
> static int lan9303_check_device(struct lan9303 *chip)
> @@ -634,7 +640,7 @@ static int lan9303_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to separate ports %d\n", ret);
>
> - ret = lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_0_OFFSET);
> + ret = lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip, 0);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to re-enable switching %d\n", ret);
>
> @@ -757,11 +763,9 @@ static int lan9303_port_enable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> /* enable internal packet processing */
> switch (port) {
> case 1:
> - return lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip,
> - LAN9303_PORT_1_OFFSET);
> + return lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip, port);
> case 2:
> - return lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip,
> - LAN9303_PORT_2_OFFSET);
> + return lan9303_enable_packet_processing(chip, port);
> default:
> dev_dbg(chip->dev,
> "Error: request to power up invalid port %d\n", port);
> @@ -778,12 +782,12 @@ static void lan9303_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> /* disable internal packet processing */
> switch (port) {
> case 1:
> - lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_1_OFFSET);
> + lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, port);
> lan9303_phy_write(ds, chip->phy_addr_sel_strap + 1,
> MII_BMCR, BMCR_PDOWN);
> break;
> case 2:
> - lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, LAN9303_PORT_2_OFFSET);
> + lan9303_disable_packet_processing(chip, port);
> lan9303_phy_write(ds, chip->phy_addr_sel_strap + 2,
> MII_BMCR, BMCR_PDOWN);
> break;
>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists