[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170803204726.74f75aaa@bbrezillon>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:47:26 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, richard@....at, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, architt@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
andy.gross@...aro.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] mtd: nand: qcom: fix config error for BCH
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 23:22:37 +0530
Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 2017-08-03 21:26, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:17:49 +0530
> > Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The configuration for BCH is not correct in the current driver.
> >> The ECC_CFG_ECC_DISABLE bit defines whether to enable or disable the
> >> BCH ECC in which
> >>
> >> 0x1 : BCH_DISABLED
> >> 0x0 : BCH_ENABLED
> >>
> >> But currently host->bch_enabled is being assined to BCH_DISABLED.
> >>
> >> Fixes: c76b78d8ec05a ("mtd: nand: Qualcomm NAND controller driver")
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> index 57d483a..bc0408c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >> /*
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2016, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2016-2017, The Linux Foundation. All rights
> >> reserved.
> >
> > Hm, this copyright update is not really related to the changes you're
> > describing in the commit message. I'll drop this line from the commit
> > (no need to resend it) and ask you to send a separate patch updating
> > the
> > copyright. Is that ok?
> >
>
> The idea was to change the copyright year since we are making
> the changes in this file. If it requires separate patch, then I
> will do the same.
Yes, I'd prefer a separate patch.
>
> Also I need to change 'assined' -> assigned in commit text.
Yep, already fixed that one.
> I can
> update the patch and fix this. I am planning to send the v3 patches
> tomorrow which incorporates all the review comments.
Can you wait a bit. I already applied some of your patches [1] and would
like to finish my review.
Thanks,
Boris
[1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day/commits/nand/next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists