linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: mux: pinctrl: drop the idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a51db36a-86ee-16ea-2063-90a55a455a9a@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:41:32 -0600
From:   Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: mux: pinctrl: drop the idle_state member

On 08/02/2017 11:19 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-08-03 00:50, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/02/2017 03:25 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> (and muxc->max_adapters == num_names)
>>
>> Well, unless muxc->deselect is true...
> 
> No, deselect does not affect neither max_adapters nor num_names. They
> are always equal.

Ah yes, I was confusing max_adapters with num_adapters.