linux-kernel - Re: [v5 11/15] arm64/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_V_T56qPS=c3kq73TLFwqpP4YHtggCrjGRmgW1itq3pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:14:49 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, willy@...radead.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [v5 11/15] arm64/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory

(+ arm64 maintainers)

Hi Pavel,

On 3 August 2017 at 22:23, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com> wrote:
> To optimize the performance of struct page initialization,
> vmemmap_populate() will no longer zero memory.
>
> We must explicitly zero the memory that is allocated by vmemmap_populate()
> for kasan, as this memory does not go through struct page initialization
> path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> index 81f03959a4ab..a57104bc54b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,31 @@ static void __init clear_pgds(unsigned long start,
>                 set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(start), __pgd(0));
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Memory that was allocated by vmemmap_populate is not zeroed, so we must
> + * zero it here explicitly.
> + */
> +static void
> +zero_vemmap_populated_memory(void)

Typo here: vemmap -> vmemmap

> +{
> +       struct memblock_region *reg;
> +       u64 start, end;
> +
> +       for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
> +               start = __phys_to_virt(reg->base);
> +               end = __phys_to_virt(reg->base + reg->size);
> +
> +               if (start >= end)

How would this ever be true? And why is it a stop condition?

> +                       break;
> +

Are you missing a couple of kasan_mem_to_shadow() calls here? I can't
believe your intention is to wipe all of DRAM.

> +               memset((void *)start, 0, end - start);
> +       }
> +
> +       start = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow(_stext);
> +       end = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow(_end);
> +       memset((void *)start, 0, end - start);
> +}
> +
>  void __init kasan_init(void)
>  {
>         u64 kimg_shadow_start, kimg_shadow_end;
> @@ -205,6 +230,13 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
>                         pfn_pte(sym_to_pfn(kasan_zero_page), PAGE_KERNEL_RO));
>
>         memset(kasan_zero_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * vmemmap_populate does not zero the memory, so we need to zero it
> +        * explicitly
> +        */
> +       zero_vemmap_populated_memory();
> +
>         cpu_replace_ttbr1(lm_alias(swapper_pg_dir));
>
>         /* At this point kasan is fully initialized. Enable error messages */
> --
> 2.13.4
>

KASAN uses vmemmap_populate as a convenience: kasan has nothing to do
with vmemmap, but the function already existed and happened to do what
KASAN requires.

Given that that will no longer be the case, it would be far better to
stop using vmemmap_populate altogether, and clone it into a KASAN
specific version (with an appropriate name) with the zeroing folded
into it.