lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:49:33 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>,
        Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] char: xilinx_hwicap: Fix warnings in the driver

On 4.8.2017 00:32, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> From: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>
>>
>> This patch fixes the below warning
>>         --> Use #include <linux/io.h> instead of <asm/io.h>
>>         --> Use #include <linux/uaccess.h> instead of <asm/uaccess.h>
>>         --> please, no space before tabs
>>         --> Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>>         --> Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
>>         --> Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>         --> Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>>         --> braces {} are not necessary for any arm of this statement
>>         --> DT compatible string "xlnx,opb-hwicap-1.00.b"
>> 	    appears un-documented
>>         --> DT compatible string "xlnx,xps-hwicap-1.00.a"
>>             appears un-documented
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <navam@...inx.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/xilinx.txt |  2 ++
> 
> It's preferred to split bindings to separate patches. No need unless you 
> respin:
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

thanks. Was there any outcome from that discussion to extract binding
out of kernel source code?

Thanks,
Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ