linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tee: constify tee_driver_ops and tee

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHUa44G4um5zFbKfNXaWuy6skCuM63Ur4dEHUmTjQcBz1uPdtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:48:45 +0200
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To:     Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: constify tee_driver_ops and tee_desc structures

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> tee_driver_ops structures are only stored in the ops field of tee_desc
> structures, which is const, and in turn tee_desc structures are only passed
> as the first argument of tee_device_alloc, and this argument is const as
> well.  Thus the two kinds of structures can be const.
>
> Done with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>

This has already been proposed by Bhumika Goyal in a more or less
identical patch. I've already picked up Bhumikas patch and will send
it upstream via arm-soc.

Thanks,
Jens