[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170804101029.GV2369@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:10:29 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] spi: pxa2xx: Convert to GPIO descriptor API
where possible
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:40:32PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>
> We still need to request/free GPIOs passed via the legacy path of
> pxa2xx_spi_chip::gpio_cs, but we can use the gpiod API otherwise.
>
> Consistently use the descriptor API instead of the legacy one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
There are some PXA2xx platforms under arch/arm/* which use this driver
and legacy GPIOs. I wonder if this causes any problems with them?
That was one of the reasons I did not convert the whole driver over GPIO
descriptors.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists