linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devfreq: replace sscanf with kstrtol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGTfZH06PFTBu4VE_5AQjmpKfhr=TD9Qj8wcHpxQubCRtRMzzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2017 00:12:57 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:     gsantosh@...eaurora.org
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        gsantosh@...l.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devfreq: replace sscanf with kstrtol

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:57 PM,  <gsantosh@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adding error checks to devfreq userspace governor, the current
> implementation results in setting wrong
> frequency when sscanf returns error.
>
>
> From 12e0a347addd70529b2c378299b27b65f0766f99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Santosh Mardi <gsantosh@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:47:11 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] devfreq: replace sscanf with kstrtol
>
> store_freq function of devfreq userspace governor
> executes further, even if error is returned from sscanf,
> this will result in setting up wrong frequency value.
>
> The usage for the sscanf is only for single variable so
> replace sscanf with kstrtol along with error check to
> bail out if any error is returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Mardi <gsantosh@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c
> b/drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c
> index 77028c2..a84796d 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c
> @@ -53,12 +53,15 @@ static ssize_t store_freq(struct device *dev, struct
> device_attribute *attr,
>         mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>         data = devfreq->data;
>
> -       sscanf(buf, "%lu", &wanted);
> +       err = kstrtol(buf, 0, &wanted);
> +       if (err < 0)
> +               goto out;

I think that just you can check the return value as following:
The other point of devfreq already uses the following style
to check the return value of sscanf. I think kstrtol is not necessary.

     err = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &wanted);
     if (err != 1)
          goto out;

And please use the scripts/get_maintainer.pl
in order to prevent the missing of the reviewer.

>         data->user_frequency = wanted;
>         data->valid = true;
>         err = update_devfreq(devfreq);
>         if (err == 0)
>                 err = count;
> +out:
>         mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>         return err;
>  }
> --
>
> Regards,
> Santosh M G.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics