[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcFB1BDNUG729mi5BkhcR_aBX4MzvoyzdRx=LaAg9=EHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:27:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86: wmi: Switch to use new generic UUID API
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.
>>
>> As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
>> the conversion here.
>>
>> While here, update Copyright to reflect this change along with previous
>> one for the topic.
>> struct guid_block {
>> - char guid[16];
>> + guid_t guid;
>
> NAK. guid_block is a firmware interface, so opaque kernel types don't
> belong in it.
I f we leave this, what do you think about everything else?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists