[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201708050149.JEC09861.MOLFtQFFVJOSOH@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 01:49:17 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
wenwei.tww@...baba-inc.com, oleg@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: fix potential data corruption when oom_reaper races with writer
Michal Hocko wrote:
> And that's why we still see the corruption. That, however, means that
> the MMF_UNSTABLE implementation has to be more complex and we have to
> hook into all anonymous memory fault paths which I hoped I could avoid
> previously.
I don't understand mm internals including pte/ptl etc. , but I guess that
the direction is correct. Since the OOM reaper basically does
Set MMF_UNSTABLE flag on mm_struct.
For each reapable page in mm_struct {
Take ptl lock.
Remove pte.
Release ptl lock.
}
the page fault handler will need to check MMF_UNSTABLE with lock held.
For each faulted page in mm_struct {
Take ptl lock.
Add pte only if MMF_UNSTABLE flag is not set.
Release ptl lock.
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists