linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Expose VMFUNC to the nested hypervisor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:58:42 -0400
From:   Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Expose VMFUNC to the nested hypervisor

David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
...
>> v1:
>>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/29/958
>> 
>> Bandan Das (3):
>>   KVM: vmx: Enable VMFUNCs
>>   KVM: nVMX: Enable VMFUNC for the L1 hypervisor
>>   KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1 hypervisor
>> 
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h |   9 +++
>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c         | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> (not 100% confident for a r-b, not because of your patches but because
> of the involved complexity (flushes, MMU ...))

You and Radim both constitute to major revisions and changes in these patches.
I would be 100% confident of a R-b tag by you.

Bandan