[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jpgini3dxkd.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:58:42 -0400
From: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Expose VMFUNC to the nested hypervisor
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
...
>> v1:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/29/958
>>
>> Bandan Das (3):
>> KVM: vmx: Enable VMFUNCs
>> KVM: nVMX: Enable VMFUNC for the L1 hypervisor
>> KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1 hypervisor
>>
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 9 +++
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> (not 100% confident for a r-b, not because of your patches but because
> of the involved complexity (flushes, MMU ...))
You and Radim both constitute to major revisions and changes in these patches.
I would be 100% confident of a R-b tag by you.
Bandan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists