linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 44/50] drm/msm: Ensure that the hardware write pointer is valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170804231553.757598885@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  4 Aug 2017 16:16:30 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 44/50] drm/msm: Ensure that the hardware write pointer is valid

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>


[ Upstream commit 88b333b0ed790f9433ff542b163bf972953b74d3 ]

Currently the value written to CP_RB_WPTR is calculated on the fly as
(rb->next - rb->start). But as the code is designed rb->next is wrapped
before writing the commands so if a series of commands happened to
fit perfectly in the ringbuffer, rb->next would end up being equal to
rb->size / 4 and thus result in an out of bounds address to CP_RB_WPTR.

The easiest way to fix this is to mask WPTR when writing it to the
hardware; it makes the hardware happy and the rest of the ringbuffer
math appears to work and there isn't any point in upsetting anything.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
[squash in is_power_of_2() check]
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c |    9 ++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c    |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
@@ -199,7 +199,14 @@ void adreno_flush(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 void adreno_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 {
 	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
-	uint32_t wptr = get_wptr(gpu->rb);
+	uint32_t wptr;
+
+	/*
+	 * Mask wptr value that we calculate to fit in the HW range. This is
+	 * to account for the possibility that the last command fit exactly into
+	 * the ringbuffer and rb->next hasn't wrapped to zero yet
+	 */
+	wptr = get_wptr(gpu->rb) & ((gpu->rb->size / 4) - 1);
 
 	/* wait for CP to drain ringbuffer: */
 	if (spin_until(adreno_gpu->memptrs->rptr == wptr))
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ struct msm_ringbuffer *msm_ringbuffer_ne
 	struct msm_ringbuffer *ring;
 	int ret;
 
-	size = ALIGN(size, 4);   /* size should be dword aligned */
+	if (WARN_ON(!is_power_of_2(size)))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	ring = kzalloc(sizeof(*ring), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ring) {