linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 91/91] Btrfs: use down_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170804231600.912663226@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  4 Aug 2017 16:16:27 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 91/91] Btrfs: use down_read_nested to make lockdep silent

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>


[ Upstream commit e321f8a801d7b4c40da8005257b05b9c2b51b072 ]

If @block_group is not @used_bg, it'll try to get @used_bg's lock without
droping @block_group 's lock and lockdep has throwed a scary deadlock warning
about it.
Fix it by using down_read_nested.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index e46e7fbe1b34..14a37ff0b9e3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -7401,7 +7401,8 @@ btrfs_lock_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
 
 		spin_unlock(&cluster->refill_lock);
 
-		down_read(&used_bg->data_rwsem);
+		/* We should only have one-level nested. */
+		down_read_nested(&used_bg->data_rwsem, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
 		spin_lock(&cluster->refill_lock);
 		if (used_bg == cluster->block_group)
-- 
2.13.4