linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/50] 3.18.64-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <215167c2-e154-2f8a-31eb-cd109d2f5c38@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:01:10 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/50] 3.18.64-stable review

On 08/04/2017 08:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:51:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:46:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 08/04/2017 04:15 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.64 release.
>>>>> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sun Aug  6 23:15:34 UTC 2017.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Preliminary:
>>>>
>>>> Lots of
>>>>
>>>> lib/string.c:31:32: fatal error: asm/word-at-a-time.h
>>>>
>>>> affecting several architectures.
>>>>
>>>> alpha:
>>>>
>>>> lib/string.c:217:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'zero_bytemask'
>>>
>>> Hm, I think I need to add c753bf34c94e ("word-at-a-time.h: support
>>> zero_bytemask() on alpha and tile"), right?  Any other arches failing?
>>
>> Hm, that doesn't work, do we care about tile? :)
>>
>> Let me see how deep this hole is, I just wanted to get strscpy into 3.18
>> to fix a bug...
> 
> Ok, I think tile and alpha should be fixed, is there anything else that
> is broken?
> 

Did you get my e-mail ? I sent it a couple of minutes ago.

Guenter