[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170805151541.GB3031@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 00:15:41 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: dvhart@...radead.org, shuah@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: futex: convert test to use ksft TAP13
framework
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:46:50PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Convert test to use ksft TAP13 framework.
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/logging.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/logging.h
> @@ -109,22 +109,20 @@ void log_verbosity(int level)
> */
> void print_result(const char *test_name, int ret)
> {
> - const char *result = "Unknown return code";
> -
> switch (ret) {
> case RET_PASS:
> - ksft_inc_pass_cnt();
> - result = PASS;
> - break;
> + ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", test_name);
> + ksft_print_cnts();
> + return;
> case RET_ERROR:
> - result = ERROR;
> - break;
> + ksft_test_result_error("%s\n", test_name);
> + ksft_print_cnts();
> + return;
This looks ok to me, but this function `ksft_test_result_error` was added
in another patch you just sent, it was a bit hard to review.
If you need to make and updates, could you please send a series next?
-Stafford
> case RET_FAIL:
> - ksft_inc_fail_cnt();
> - result = FAIL;
> - break;
> + ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", test_name);
> + ksft_print_cnts();
> + return;
> }
> - printf("selftests: %s [%s]\n", test_name, result);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists