| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170806164428.2273-3-mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:43:53 +0200
From: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v06 02/36] uapi scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h: use __u8, __u32 and __u64 from linux/types.h
Fixes userspace compilation errors like:
scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h:83:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint8_t’
Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
---
include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
index 3031b900b087..1a2044755636 100644
--- a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
+++ b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
#ifndef SCSI_BSG_FC_H
#define SCSI_BSG_FC_H
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
/*
* This file intended to be included by both kernel and user space
*/
@@ -80,10 +82,10 @@
* with the transport upon completion of the login.
*/
struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport {
- uint8_t reserved;
+ __u8 reserved;
/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to login to */
- uint8_t port_id[3];
+ __u8 port_id[3];
};
/* Response:
@@ -101,10 +103,10 @@ struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport {
* remain logged in with the remote port.
*/
struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport {
- uint8_t reserved;
+ __u8 reserved;
/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to logout of */
- uint8_t port_id[3];
+ __u8 port_id[3];
};
/* Response:
@@ -125,10 +127,10 @@ struct fc_bsg_host_els {
* ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as byte 0
* of the payload)
*/
- uint8_t command_code;
+ __u8 command_code;
/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */
- uint8_t port_id[3];
+ __u8 port_id[3];
};
/* Response:
@@ -165,14 +167,14 @@ struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply {
* Note: x_RJT/BSY status will indicae that the rjt_data field
* is valid and contains the reason/explanation values.
*/
- uint32_t status; /* See FC_CTELS_STATUS_xxx */
+ __u32 status; /* See FC_CTELS_STATUS_xxx */
/* valid if status is not FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK */
struct {
- uint8_t action; /* fragment_id for CT REJECT */
- uint8_t reason_code;
- uint8_t reason_explanation;
- uint8_t vendor_unique;
+ __u8 action; /* fragment_id for CT REJECT */
+ __u8 reason_code;
+ __u8 reason_explanation;
+ __u8 vendor_unique;
} rjt_data;
};
@@ -188,17 +190,17 @@ struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply {
* and whether to tear it down after the request.
*/
struct fc_bsg_host_ct {
- uint8_t reserved;
+ __u8 reserved;
/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */
- uint8_t port_id[3];
+ __u8 port_id[3];
/*
* We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's
*/
- uint32_t preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */
- uint32_t preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
- uint32_t preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */
+ __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */
+ __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
+ __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */
};
/* Response:
@@ -218,17 +220,17 @@ struct fc_bsg_host_vendor {
* Identifies the vendor that the message is formatted for. This
* should be the recipient of the message.
*/
- uint64_t vendor_id;
+ __u64 vendor_id;
/* start of vendor command area */
- uint32_t vendor_cmd[0];
+ __u32 vendor_cmd[0];
};
/* Response:
*/
struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply {
/* start of vendor response area */
- uint32_t vendor_rsp[0];
+ __u32 vendor_rsp[0];
};
@@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ struct fc_bsg_rport_els {
* ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as
* byte 0 of the payload)
*/
- uint8_t els_code;
+ __u8 els_code;
};
/* Response:
@@ -265,9 +267,9 @@ struct fc_bsg_rport_ct {
/*
* We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's
*/
- uint32_t preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */
- uint32_t preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
- uint32_t preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */
+ __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */
+ __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
+ __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */
};
/* Response:
*
@@ -279,7 +281,7 @@ struct fc_bsg_rport_ct {
/* request (CDB) structure of the sg_io_v4 */
struct fc_bsg_request {
- uint32_t msgcode;
+ __u32 msgcode;
union {
struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport h_addrport;
struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport h_delrport;
@@ -303,10 +305,10 @@ struct fc_bsg_reply {
* msg and status fields. The per-msgcode reply structure
* will contain valid data.
*/
- uint32_t result;
+ __u32 result;
/* If there was reply_payload, how much was recevied ? */
- uint32_t reply_payload_rcv_len;
+ __u32 reply_payload_rcv_len;
union {
struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply vendor_reply;
--
2.13.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists