linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v06 18/36] uapi linux/errqueue.h: include linux/time.h in user space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF=yD-K9UvhUdvWxaDPjnHehbgpPqMiLc7co0fPKK3MEFp=inA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:03:52 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v06 18/36] uapi linux/errqueue.h: include linux/time.h in
 user space

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:42:13PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:24:20PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> >> >> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>> >> >> > +#include <linux/time.h>
>> >> >> > +#else
>> >> >> > +#include <time.h>
>> >> >> > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This will break applications that include <linux/time.h> manually.
>> >> >> I previously sent a patch to use libc-compat to make compilation succeed
>> >> >> when both are included in the case where <linux/time.h> is included after
>> >> >> <time.h>.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/12/872
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The inverse will require changes to the libc header to avoid redefining
>> >> >> symbols already defined by <linux/time.h>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The second patch in that 2-patch set included <linux/time.h>
>> >> >> unconditionally after the fix. This broke builds that also included
>> >> >> <time.h> in the wrong order. I did not resubmit the first patch as a
>> >> >> stand-alone, as it is not sufficient to avoid breakage.
>> >> >
>> >> > I wasn't aware of your change, but I was about to send this to fix the
>> >> > case when glibc <time.h> is included before <linux/time.h>:
>> >> >
>> >> > https://github.com/mcfrisk/linux/commit/f3952a27b8a21c6478d26e6246055383483f6a66
>> >>
>> >> There are a few differences between the two. Including <time.h> does not
>> >> unconditionally define all the symbols. Some are conditional on additional
>> >> state, such as __timespec_defined.
>> >
>> > Yep, your patch seems better for libc-compat.h. Could you send it again?
>>
>> Okay. Or feel free to include it in the patchset if that helps resolve
>> dependencies.
>
> If you don't have the time, I will send tomorrow a new version of this
> patch which fixes the commit topic and before that your libc-compat.h change
> so both could be applied together.

Please do. Thanks!