linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] DRBD-receiver: Fine-tuning for six function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:18:22 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] DRBD-receiver: Fine-tuning for six function
 implementations

> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:13:22 +0200
> 
> Several update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (13):
>   Use kmalloc_array() in receive_uuids()
>   Delete an error message for a failed kmalloc_array() call
>   Move an assignment in receive_uuids()
>   Improve a size determination in drbd_do_features()
>   Delete an unnecessary initialisation in receive_sizes()
>   Improve a size determination in receive_sizes()
>   Delete an error message for a failed kzalloc() call in receive_sizes()
>   Move an assignment in receive_sizes()
>   Improve determination of sizes in receive_SyncParam()
>   Delete error messages for failed resource allocations in receive_SyncParam()
>   Improve a size determination in receive_protocol()
>   Delete error messages for failed resource allocations in receive_protocol()
>   Improve determination of sizes in receive_Barrier()
> 
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Would you like to take another look at change possibilities
for this software module?

Regards,
Markus