[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hC4UGtrFu_+=RX32EMb5jX5P3hfXpvv-Nb_NZ3Ldbwqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:57:21 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM / s2idle: Rename PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE to PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> To make it clear that the symbol in question refers to
>> suspend-to-idle, rename it from PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE to
>> PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 -
>> drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 2 -
>> include/linux/suspend.h | 4 +--
>> kernel/power/suspend.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> kernel/power/suspend_test.c | 4 +--
>> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/suspend.h
>> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h
>> @@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ static inline void pm_restore_console(vo
>> typedef int __bitwise suspend_state_t;
>>
>> #define PM_SUSPEND_ON ((__force suspend_state_t) 0)
>> -#define PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1)
>> +#define PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1)
>> #define PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY ((__force suspend_state_t) 2)
>> #define PM_SUSPEND_MEM ((__force suspend_state_t) 3)
>
> I feel something like PM_SUSPEND_IDLE is more consistent with the
> existing PM_SUSPEND_MEM. Also the proposed PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE has
> 'SUSPEND' in it twice, so at the very least it should be
> PM_SUSPEND_2IDLE :-)
>
>
>> -#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE
>> +#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE
>> #define PM_SUSPEND_MAX ((__force suspend_state_t) 4)
OK, I can call it PM_SUSPEND_IDLE no problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists