[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502108760.2490.28.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 14:26:00 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Jacob Chen <jacobchen110@...il.com>
Cc: "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roliveir@...opsys.com,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, slongerbeam@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, lolivei@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: OV5647: gate clock lane before stream on
Hi Jacob,
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 19:06 +0800, Jacob Chen wrote:
[...]
> >> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c
> >> > @@ -253,6 +253,10 @@ static int ov5647_stream_on(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >> > {
> >> > int ret;
> >> >
> >> > + ret = ov5647_write(sd, 0x4800, 0x04);
> >> > + if (ret < 0)
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > +
So this clears BIT(1) (force clock lane to low power mode) and BIT(5)
(gate clock lane while idle) that were set by ov5647_stream_off() during
__sensor_init() due to the change below.
Is there a reason, btw, that this driver is full of magic register
addresses and values? A few #defines would make this a lot more
readable.
> >> > ret = ov5647_write(sd, 0x4202, 0x00);
> >> > if (ret < 0)
> >> > return ret;
> >> > @@ -264,6 +268,10 @@ static int ov5647_stream_off(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >> > {
> >> > int ret;
> >> >
> >> > + ret = ov5647_write(sd, 0x4800, 0x25);
> >> > + if (ret < 0)
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > +
> >> > ret = ov5647_write(sd, 0x4202, 0x0f);
> >> > if (ret < 0)
> >> > return ret;
> >> > @@ -320,7 +328,7 @@ static int __sensor_init(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >> > return ret;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - return ov5647_write(sd, 0x4800, 0x04);
> >> > + return ov5647_stream_off(sd);
I see now that BIT(2) (keep bus in LP-11 while idle) is and was always
set. So the change is that initially, additionally to LP-11 mode, the
clock lane is gated and forced into low power mode, as well?
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static int ov5647_sensor_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> >> > --
> >> > 2.7.4
> >> >
> >>
> >> Can anyone comment on it?
> >>
> >> I saw there is a same discussion in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9569031/
> >> There is a comment in i.MX CSI2 driver.
> >> "
> >> Configure MIPI Camera Sensor to put all Tx lanes in LP-11 state.
> >> This must be carried out by the MIPI sensor's s_power(ON) subdev
> >> op.
> >> "
> >> That's what this patch do, sensor driver should make sure that clock
> >> lanes are in stop state while not streaming.
> >
> > This is not the same, as far as I can tell. BIT(5) is just clock lane
> > gating, as you describe above. To put the bus into LP-11 state, BIT(2)
> > needs to be set.
> >
>
> Yeah, but i double that clock lane is not in LP11 when continue clock
> mode is enabled.
If indeed LP-11 state is not achieved while the sensor is idle, as long
as BIT(5) is cleared, I think this patch is correct.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists