[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502116796.2042.124.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:49:32 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist()
interface
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 07:12 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:39:35PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > Well, we did talk a lot about your suggested name,
> > "acpi_blacklist", and I explained that it did not work since it'd
> > be used for both black and white-list. We've agreed on that.
> >
> > You then suggested it's "platform", not "OEM". Since this is an
> > ACPI structure defined in "acpi.h", its terminology generally
> > follows ACPI spec, which I did.
> >
> > I understand that you feel strongly against "OEM" (sorry about
> > that). How about "acpi_platform_list"? Does it work for you?
>
> Yes, I thought we agreed on all that.
Sounds good. Will change to "acpi_platform_list".
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists