lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170807154152.wt5b4y3s3oe4cnam@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:41:52 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Liam Breck <liam@...workimprov.net>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] staging: typec: fusb302: Add support for
 fcs,vbus-regulator-name device-property

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 07-08-17 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:

> Problem 1)

> The regulator in question is part of the bq24292i charger-IC attached to
> a private i2c bus between the PMIC and the charger. The driver for the i2c
> controller inside the PMIC which drivers this bus currently also instantiates
> the i2c-client for the charger:

...

> Note that the bq24190 driver is a generic driver, so to pass the
> board specific regulator_init_data to it I would need to somehow
> pass it here, but I don't see how, except by storing a pointer to
> it in an u64 device-property which seems like a bad idea

I2C has a perfectly good platform_data pointer in the board info for
this stuff.

> Problem 2)

> Even if I could add the mapping through regulator_init_data
> then it may well be too late, if the regulator_get happens
> before the bq24190 driver registers its regulator (and thus
> the mapping) the regulator_get for it may have already
> happened and returned a dummy-regulator, or another regulator
> with the rather generic vbus name.

If you don't have control over the instantiation ordering but you have a
firmware which claims to provide a complete description of regulators
then you'd need to add an interface that allows mappings to be
registered separately to regulator registration.

Whatever you're doing the answer isn't to try to specify the name of the
supply through some firmware binding, that's just obviously not sensible
both in terms of a firmware abstraction and in terms of how the
abstractions in Linux work.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ