linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] printk: Add monotonic, boottime, and realtime timestamps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170807171828.w7cefxruiljzlicd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:18:28 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] printk: Add monotonic, boottime, and realtime
 timestamps

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:52:42AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> +static u64 printk_get_ts(void)
> +{
> +	u64 mono, offset_real;
> +
> +	if (printk_time <= PRINTK_TIME_LOCAL)
> +		return local_clock();
> +
> +	if (printk_time == PRINTK_TIME_BOOT)
> +		return ktime_get_boot_log_ts();
> +
> +	mono = ktime_get_real_log_ts(&offset_real);
> +
> +	if (printk_time == PRINTK_TIME_MONO)
> +		return mono;
> +
> +	return mono + offset_real;
> +}
>  
>  static size_t print_time(u64 ts, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -1643,7 +1750,7 @@ static bool cont_add(int facility, int level, enum log_flags flags, const char *
>  		cont.facility = facility;
>  		cont.level = level;
>  		cont.owner = current;
> -		cont.ts_nsec = local_clock();
> +		cont.ts_nsec = printk_get_ts();
>  		cont.flags = flags;
>  	}
>  

So you really want to do all those branches every single time you
printk() ? I know printk() is somewhat of a slow path, but shees that's
ugly.

Why not have that setup function of yours set a function pointer?