[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4541844e-989c-13fb-0d37-44c39406bd1b@lechnology.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:00:28 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/tinydrm: mipi-dbi: Fix unbalanced DMA access
On 08/04/2017 01:49 AM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
> Den 04.08.2017 00.41, skrev David Lechner:
>> On 08/01/2017 03:14 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> If we return here and import_attach is true, then
>>> dma_buf_end_cpu_access()
>>> will not be called balance dma_buf_begin_cpu_access().
>>>
>>> Fix by setting ret instead of returning.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c
>>> index c83eeb7..e10fa4b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c
>>> @@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ static int mipi_dbi_buf_copy(void *dst, struct
>>> drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>> dev_err_once(fb->dev->dev, "Format is not supported: %s\n",
>>> drm_get_format_name(fb->format->format,
>>> &format_name));
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + break;
>>> }
>>> if (import_attach)
>>>
>>
>>
>> I just realized that the next line here can mask ret.
>>
>>
>> if (import_attach)
>> ret = dma_buf_end_cpu_access(import_attach->dmabuf,
>> DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>
>> So, we should either ignore the return value from
>> dma_buf_end_cpu_access() always or add some logic to ignore it if ret
>> is already an error.
>>
>> In some of the other patches I have been sending, we have the same
>> situation. I those, I have opted to just ignore the return value from
>> dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). e.g...
>>
>>
>> if (import_attach)
>> dma_buf_end_cpu_access(import_attach->dmabuf, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>
>> Is this a reasonable thing to do?
>
> mipi_dbi_buf_copy() can be used by other rgb565 controllers, hence
> the format check I think. So when that happens, it can be moved to
> tinydrm-helpers.
>
> Currently it's not possible to get an illegal format, since mipi-dbi
> only supports those two formats.
> Userspace can't set an illegal format, beacuse it's checked:
> drm_atomic_commit -> drm_atomic_check_only -> drm_atomic_plane_check ->
> drm_plane_check_pixel_format
>
> So I think we can just leave this alone, or put the check before
> import_attach if you really want to put this straight.
>
I guess we can just leave it alone for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists