linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170807145949.4c4f4dc6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:59:49 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi Neal,

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:21:43 -0400 Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.  
> 
> Sorry about that. Will try to follow that procedure in the future.

The above is a generic statement I add to all these emails.  It is
aimed more at the maintainers if the trees involved, no the developers
of patches.  I don't think you need to do anything different in these
cases with the "net" and "net-next" tree.  Dave Miller will fix up any
conflicts when he next merges the net tree into the net-next tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell