[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:30:12 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@...wei.com>, rkrcmar@...hat.com
Cc: agraf@...e.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
james.hogan@...tec.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, weidong.huang@...wei.com,
arei.gonglei@...wei.com, wangxinxin.wang@...wei.com,
longpeng.mike@...il.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: implement the logic for spinlock
optimization
On 08/08/2017 06:05, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index cd0e6e6..dec5e8a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> switch (code) {
> case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT:
> - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
> + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->spin_in_kernel(vcpu));
> break;
> case HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE:
> case HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT:
This can be true as well. I can change this on commit.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists