[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOo15PhiUwEZ_A-xb15-AgTvL9MOra+1X+yjDz_CrjJsag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 14:24:32 -0700
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Binutils <binutils@...rceware.org>
Subject: Re: new ELF marking
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I believe this would only be an output bit, but I'm not sure how it
>> > would be wired into binutils. Kostya, do you know any details about
>> > how AddressSanitizer might be able to create this ELF note?
>
> I don't, hopefully H.J's suggestion works.
> Will it be backward compatible?
> (i.e. will the binaries built in the new way work on the old kernels?)
>
>
Yes, it is backward compatible by design.
--
H.J.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists