lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170809220834.sjol4cufvjqa6rde@piout.net>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:08:34 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_tclib: fix error return code in tc_probe()

On 09/08/2017 at 11:42:50 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> platform_get_irq() returns an error code, but the atmel_tclib driver
> ignores it and always returns -EINVAL. This is not correct and,
> prevents -EPROBE_DEFER from being propagated properly.
> 

Which will never happen because the kernel would not reach that point if
the irqchip driver was not present. I would really love people to stop
littering perfectly working drivers with unused error strings.

> Print error message and propagate the return value of platform_get_irq
> on failure.
> 
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c b/drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c
> index ac24a4b..c5d3449 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel_tclib.c
> @@ -112,8 +112,10 @@ static int __init tc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	unsigned int	i;
>  
>  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (irq < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", irq);
> +		return irq;
> +	}
>  
>  	tc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct atmel_tc), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!tc)
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ