[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5125286.quh3iuZPLl@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:42:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Ronald Tschalaer <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
Federico Lorenzi <florenzi@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Leif Liddy <leif.liddy@...il.com>,
Daniel Roschka <danielroschka@...enitydawn.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Apple SPI properties
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 3:08:58 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> > Retrieve device properties on Macs with an Apple-specific _DSM and
> > use them in lieu of _CRS data upon SPI slave initialization
> > in preparation of supporting the SPI keyboard on 2015+ MacBooks, v4.
> >
> > Please refer to the cover letter of v1 for further details:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg75537.html
> >
> > Changes v3 -> v4:
> >
> > Patch 1:
> > - Extend consolidation of Apple DMI checks to the entire tree
> > instead of just the ACPI core. (Rafael, Andy, Darren)
> >
> > Patches 2 - 5 are as before.
>
> Since the majority of the material here has already been ACKed or
> reviewed by the most interested parties and it looks OK to me too, I'm
> going to take it as ACPI changes unless anyone in the CC has any
> strong opinions against that.
No objections I know of, so applied now.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists