linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: ti,edma: Add 66AK2G specific information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170809235743.tiqzesrebt2z63s3@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:57:43 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: ti,edma: Add 66AK2G specific information

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:45AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
> >>> -Example:
> >>> +Examples:
> >>
> >> Do we really need to expand the examples to have identical set, but with
> >> power-domains?
> > 
> > IIRC, there was a feedback to add an example(not able to fine that
> > specific email). If you strongly disagree with this, I can drop it and
> > resend it.
> 
> This is only an example, not a comprehensive set of possibilities. I
> think it should be kept to one.

Agreed.

Rob