[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <494db0c8-8c31-f2ce-17fc-7b96b74f0b28@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:02:12 +0200
From: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_set_ifconfig.sh double check before setting ip
On 08/09/2017 06:11 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:53:45 +0200
>
>> This patch fixes the behavior of the hv_set_ifconfig script when setting
>> the interface ip. Sometimes the interface has already been configured by
>> network daemon, in this case hv_set_ifconfig causes "RTNETLINK: file
>> exists error"; in order to avoid this error this patch makes sure double
>> checks the interface before trying anything.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@...hat.com>
>
> And if the daemon sets the address after you test it but before
> you try to set it in the script, what happens?
>
> This is why I hate changes like this. They don't remove the problem,
> they make it smaller. And smaller in a bad way. Smaller makes the
> problem even more harder to diagnose when it happens.
>
> There is implicitly no synchonization between network configuration
> daemons and things people run by hand like this script.
>
> So, caveat emptor.
>
> I'm not applying this, sorry.
>
This is just part of the resolution, actually. For RHEL I also configure
hyperv-daemons' systemd config file to be run only after network service
is up.
So perhaps my solution should be distro-agnostic and only involve this
script as part of it? In this case I'll elaborate a little more then.
Thanks for the comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists