Message-ID: <97497123-2c24-6297-2d12-4f407d101b66@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:59:50 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
        Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/18] cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI
 message protocol



On 09/08/17 05:18, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-08-17, 15:31, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> I don't think its the Microsoft exchange server which screwed up tabs and
> spaces, but you.
> 

Indeed, copy paste to blame ;)

>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> index 2011fec2d6ad..c34633855bc7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
>> @@ -215,6 +215,17 @@ config ARM_SA1100_CPUFREQ
>>  config ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ
>>  	bool
>>  
>> +config ARM_SCMI_CPUFREQ
>> +        tristate "SCMI based CPUfreq driver"
> 
> You have used spaces here instead of tab and at multiple other places, can you
> please fix them all ?
> 

Done locally.

>> +	depends on ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL || COMPILE_TEST
>> +	select PM_OPP
>> +        help
>> +	  This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCMI
>> +	  protocol for CPU power management.
>> +
>> +	  This driver uses SCMI Message Protocol driver to interact with the
>> +	  firmware providing the CPU DVFS functionality.
>> +
>>  config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ
>>          tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver"
>>  	depends on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ && ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL && COMMON_CLK_SCPI
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> index ab3a42cd29ef..4810b45568d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_S3C64XX_CPUFREQ)	+= s3c64xx-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_S5PV210_CPUFREQ)	+= s5pv210-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SA1100_CPUFREQ)	+= sa1100-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ)	+= sa1110-cpufreq.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_CPUFREQ)		+= scmi-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ)		+= scpi-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ)		+= spear-cpufreq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_STI_CPUFREQ)		+= sti-cpufreq.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..034359cafea5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
>> +/*
>> + * System Control and Power Interface (SCMI) based CPUFreq Interface driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ARM Ltd.
>> + * Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
>> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
>> +#include <linux/export.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +struct scmi_data {
>> +	int domain_id;
>> +	struct device *cpu_dev;
>> +	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>> +	const struct scmi_handle *handle;
> 
> This stores the same handle pointer which is stored in the global variable
> below. Right? Why keep a local variable here at all ?
> 

Yes, you are right. Initially, started with just private pointers and
then added global. I was thinking of calling devm_scmi_handle_get per
policy to reflect the refcount correctly and drop global variable. Let
me know what you think.

>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct scmi_handle *handle;
>> +
>> +unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	unsigned long rate;
>> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>> +	struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +	struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = priv->handle->perf_ops;
> 
> Normally people prefer to keep these definitions in decreasing order of their
> lengths. i.e. ret and rate would be defined in the last line. Though I would
> leave it to you to decide.
> 

I too prefer that, will fix that.

>> +
>> +	ret = perf_ops->freq_get(priv->handle, priv->domain_id, &rate, false);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID;
> 
> This is something special which is used only when we are returning indexes and
> I am not sure if this will have benefit here. I will rather return 0 here.
> That's what other drivers are doing.
> 

Indeed had 0 initially but changed as per Juri's suggestion. But is 0
treated as failure and still running at current OPP ? and not 0KHz I assume.

>> +	return rate / 1000;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +scmi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
>> +{
>> +	struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +	struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = priv->handle->perf_ops;
>> +	u64 freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
>> +
>> +	return perf_ops->freq_set(priv->handle, priv->domain_id, freq, false);
>> +}
> 
> I suppose any CPU can change the frequency of any other CPU here, right? You
> must set policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true, from ->init() then.
> 

OK, I missed to see something like that exists, will do.

>> +static int
>> +scmi_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpumask)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu, domain, ret = 0;
> 
> You don't need to initialize ret here and I would rather name it tdomain or
> something else. ret is a lot used to store error/success values, which isn't
> your case.
> 

Agreed.

>> +	struct device *tcpu_dev;
>> +
>> +	domain = handle->perf_ops->device_domain_id(cpu_dev);
>> +	if (domain < 0)
>> +		return domain;
>> +
>> +	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_dev->id, cpumask);
> 
> The mask already have this set from the core, you don't need to do it again.
> 

Cool, wasn't aware of that.

>> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> +		if (cpu == cpu_dev->id)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		tcpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> +		if (!tcpu_dev)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		ret = handle->perf_ops->device_domain_id(tcpu_dev);
>> +		if (ret == domain)
>> +			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	unsigned int latency;
>> +	struct device *cpu_dev;
>> +	struct scmi_data *priv;
>> +	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
>> +
>> +	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
>> +	if (!cpu_dev) {
>> +		pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", policy->cpu);
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = handle->perf_ops->add_opps_to_device(cpu_dev);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to add opps to the device\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = scmi_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to get sharing cpumask\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to mark OPPs as shared: %d\n",
>> +			__func__, ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * But we need OPP table to function so if it is not there let's
>> +	 * give platform code chance to provide it for us.
>> +	 */
> 
> How are we getting the OPPs? DT or non DT ?
> 

Non DT :), from the firmware.

>> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
>> +	if (ret <= 0) {
>> +		dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "OPP table is not ready, deferring probe\n");
>> +		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		goto out_free_opp;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!priv) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto out_free_opp;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
>> +		goto out_free_priv;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv->handle = handle;
>> +	priv->cpu_dev = cpu_dev;
>> +	priv->domain_id = handle->perf_ops->device_domain_id(cpu_dev);
>> +
>> +	policy->driver_data = priv;
>> +
>> +	ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: invalid frequency table: %d\n", __func__,
>> +			ret);
>> +		goto out_free_cpufreq_table;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	latency = handle->perf_ops->get_transition_latency(cpu_dev);
>> +	if (!latency)
>> +		latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
>> +
>> +	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +out_free_cpufreq_table:
>> +	dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
>> +out_free_priv:
>> +	kfree(priv);
>> +out_free_opp:
>> +	dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(policy->cpus);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int scmi_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> +	struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +
>> +	cpufreq_cooling_unregister(priv->cdev);
>> +	dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &policy->freq_table);
>> +	dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(policy->related_cpus);
>> +	kfree(priv);
> 
> I would rather swap the above two lines to keep the same order as in probe.
> Though nothing would fail with the current code as well.
> 

Sure.

>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void scmi_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> +	struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +	struct device_node *np = of_node_get(priv->cpu_dev->of_node);
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!np))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
>> +		u32 pcoeff = 0;
>> +
>> +		of_property_read_u32(np, "dynamic-power-coefficient",
>> +				     &pcoeff);
>> +
>> +		priv->cdev = of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register(np, policy,
>> +							       pcoeff, NULL);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(priv->cdev)) {
>> +			dev_err(priv->cpu_dev,
>> +				"running cpufreq without cooling device: %ld\n",
>> +				PTR_ERR(priv->cdev));
>> +
>> +			priv->cdev = NULL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	of_node_put(np);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver = {
>> +	.name			= "scmi",
>> +	.flags			= CPUFREQ_STICKY |
>> +					CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
>> +					CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
>> +	.verify			= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
>> +	.attr			= cpufreq_generic_attr,
>> +	.target_index		= scmi_cpufreq_set_target,
>> +	.get			= scmi_cpufreq_get_rate,
>> +	.init			= scmi_cpufreq_init,
>> +	.exit			= scmi_cpufreq_exit,
>> +	.ready			= scmi_cpufreq_ready,
>> +};
> 
> Above block has lots of space/tab issues. Can you please use tabs before "="
> instead?
> 

OK, again copy pasted from some other driver ;)

>> +static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	handle = devm_scmi_handle_get(&pdev->dev);
> 
> What code is creating this pdev ?
> 

SCMI driver, once it finds the performance protocol is available
and setup/initialized.

Thanks for the review.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists