linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:00:06 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, marc.dionne@...istor.com,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: rxrpc: Replace time_t type with time64_t type

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:33 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
>> > @@ -533,8 +536,9 @@ static int rxrpc_preparse_xdr_rxk5(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep,
>> >              pptoken = &(*pptoken)->next)
>> >                 continue;
>> >         *pptoken = token;
>> > -       if (token->kad->expiry < prep->expiry)
>> > -               prep->expiry = token->kad->expiry;
>> ...
>>
>> I'm still slightly puzzled by what this function does: it does have four
>> timestamps (authtime, starttime, endtime, renew_till) that are all
>> transferred as 64-bit values and won't expire, but then it also uses the
>> 32-bit expiry field in rxrpc_key_token->kad->expiry instead of the 64-bit
>> rxrpc_key_token->k5 fields.
>
> Good catch.  This is a cut'n'paste error.  It should be using
> token->k5->expiry here not token->kad->expiry.

Do you know which format is used in practice? Are both kad and k5 common
among rxrpc users?

      Arnd