[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F9CD614C-2D81-4024-99EA-B3BD6F640916@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:10:59 -0700
From: Variksla <variksla@...il.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: bjorn@...k.no, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jikos@...nel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
balbi@...com, eu@...ipetonello.com, k.opasiak@...sung.com
Subject: Re: f_hid.c conversion to the new function interface and crash due to race
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 2:56 AM, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
Thanks for replying.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> noman pouigt <variksla@...il.com> writes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently using 3.18 linux kernel and getting below
>
> return -EKERNELTOOOLD;
>
> Sorry, you're on your own. You should ask for support from whoever
> forces you to use 3.18 kernel.
I have updated f_hid.c file to latest kernel though as I knew it would be too much to ask to get support for old code.
I am just not sure about how to instantiate the function driver as earlier f_fs was instantiating the hid driver. However, after hid got converted to new function driver who is responsible for calling setup, bind and unbind functions in f_hid.c ?
Below is the glue code in android.c.
drivers/usb/gadget/android.c
static struct android_usb_function hid_function = {
.name = "hid",
.init = hid_function_init,
.cleanup = hid_function_cleanup,
.bind_config = hid_function_bind_config,
.attributes = hid_function_attributes,
};
Is there something similar in new function driver in upstream kernel?
>
> --
> balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists