[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1502296367.3602.26.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:32:47 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the scsi tree
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:24 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> James,
>
> >
> > Yes we had to drop a commit which proved problematic in the fixes
> > tree.
>
> I'm still not sure why you decided to rebase instead of waiting for
> me to drop the patch. That's how we usually do it...
We can certainly do it that way around. If you want to rebase to drop
the patch, I can set the top of the fixes tree to your rebase.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists