| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 17:57:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, hsweeten@...ionengravers.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around" to the spi tree
The patch
spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 48738831018003c80f1131e77a25b8e832bec6f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:51:29 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ep93xx: pass the spi_master pointer around
Change the parameters for some of the functions so that the spi_master
pointer is passed around instead of the private data ep93xx_spi pointer.
This allows removing the 'pdev' member of the private data and will
help with some later cleanup.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index 041842e0d028..2d80e36f5015 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@
/**
* struct ep93xx_spi - EP93xx SPI controller structure
- * @pdev: pointer to platform device
* @clk: clock for the controller
* @mmio: pointer to ioremap()'d registers
* @sspdr_phys: physical address of the SSPDR register
@@ -90,7 +89,6 @@
* the client
*/
struct ep93xx_spi {
- const struct platform_device *pdev;
struct clk *clk;
void __iomem *mmio;
unsigned long sspdr_phys;
@@ -113,15 +111,15 @@ struct ep93xx_spi {
/**
* ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors() - calculates SPI clock divisors
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
* @rate: desired SPI output clock rate
* @div_cpsr: pointer to return the cpsr (pre-scaler) divider
* @div_scr: pointer to return the scr divider
*/
-static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(struct spi_master *master,
u32 rate, u8 *div_cpsr, u8 *div_scr)
{
- struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(espi->pdev);
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
unsigned long spi_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(espi->clk);
int cpsr, scr;
@@ -162,17 +160,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !enable);
}
-static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(struct spi_master *master,
struct spi_device *spi,
struct spi_transfer *xfer)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
u8 dss = bits_per_word_to_dss(xfer->bits_per_word);
u8 div_cpsr = 0;
u8 div_scr = 0;
u16 cr0;
int err;
- err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(espi, xfer->speed_hz,
+ err = ep93xx_spi_calc_divisors(master, xfer->speed_hz,
&div_cpsr, &div_scr);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -181,9 +180,9 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(const struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
cr0 |= (spi->mode & (SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL)) << SSPCR0_MODE_SHIFT;
cr0 |= dss;
- dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
+ dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: mode %d, cpsr %d, scr %d, dss %d\n",
spi->mode, div_cpsr, div_scr, dss);
- dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
+ dev_dbg(&master->dev, "setup: cr0 %#x\n", cr0);
writel(div_cpsr, espi->mmio + SSPCPSR);
writel(cr0, espi->mmio + SSPCR0);
@@ -234,8 +233,9 @@ static void ep93xx_do_read(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, struct spi_transfer *t)
* When this function is finished, RX FIFO should be empty and TX FIFO should be
* full.
*/
-static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
struct spi_transfer *t = msg->state;
@@ -257,13 +257,15 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
return -EINPROGRESS;
}
-static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+
/*
* Now everything is set up for the current transfer. We prime the TX
* FIFO, enable interrupts, and wait for the transfer to complete.
*/
- if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+ if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
u32 val;
val = readl(espi->mmio + SSPCR1);
@@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
/**
* ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
* @dir: DMA transfer direction
*
* Function configures the DMA, maps the buffer and prepares the DMA
@@ -284,8 +286,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
* in case of failure.
*/
static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
-ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
+ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
+ enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
@@ -361,7 +365,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
}
if (WARN_ON(len)) {
- dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
+ dev_warn(&master->dev, "len = %zu expected 0!\n", len);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -379,15 +383,16 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
/**
* ep93xx_spi_dma_finish() - finishes with a DMA transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
* @dir: DMA transfer direction
*
* Function finishes with the DMA transfer. After this, the DMA buffer is
* unmapped.
*/
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
struct dma_chan *chan;
struct sg_table *sgt;
@@ -407,22 +412,23 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
complete(callback_param);
}
-static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
+static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
- rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+ rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
- dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
+ dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
return;
}
- txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+ txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
- dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+ dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
return;
}
@@ -440,13 +446,13 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
- ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
}
/**
* ep93xx_spi_process_transfer() - processes one SPI transfer
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
* @msg: current message
* @t: transfer to process
*
@@ -454,17 +460,18 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
* transfer is complete (may sleep) and updates @msg->status based on whether
* transfer was successfully processed or not.
*/
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct spi_master *master,
struct spi_message *msg,
struct spi_transfer *t)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
int err;
msg->state = t;
- err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(espi, msg->spi, t);
+ err = ep93xx_spi_chip_setup(master, msg->spi, t);
if (err) {
- dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev,
+ dev_err(&master->dev,
"failed to setup chip for transfer\n");
msg->status = err;
return;
@@ -479,9 +486,9 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
* So in these cases we will be using PIO and don't bother for DMA.
*/
if (espi->dma_rx && t->len > SPI_FIFO_SIZE)
- ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(espi);
+ ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(master);
else
- ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(espi);
+ ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(master);
/*
* In case of error during transmit, we bail out from processing
@@ -516,7 +523,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
/*
* ep93xx_spi_process_message() - process one SPI message
- * @espi: ep93xx SPI controller struct
+ * @master: SPI master
* @msg: message to process
*
* This function processes a single SPI message. We go through all transfers in
@@ -526,9 +533,10 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
* @msg->status contains %0 in case of success or negative error code in case of
* failure.
*/
-static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
+static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct spi_master *master,
struct spi_message *msg)
{
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
unsigned long timeout;
struct spi_transfer *t;
@@ -538,7 +546,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SPI_TIMEOUT);
while (readl(espi->mmio + SSPSR) & SSPSR_RNE) {
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
- dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+ dev_warn(&master->dev,
"timeout while flushing RX FIFO\n");
msg->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
return;
@@ -558,7 +566,7 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_process_message(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
ep93xx_spi_cs_control(msg->spi, true);
list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
- ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(espi, msg, t);
+ ep93xx_spi_process_transfer(master, msg, t);
if (msg->status)
break;
}
@@ -580,7 +588,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
msg->actual_length = 0;
espi->current_msg = msg;
- ep93xx_spi_process_message(espi, msg);
+ ep93xx_spi_process_message(master, msg);
espi->current_msg = NULL;
spi_finalize_current_message(master);
@@ -590,7 +598,8 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
- struct ep93xx_spi *espi = dev_id;
+ struct spi_master *master = dev_id;
+ struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
u32 val;
/*
@@ -600,7 +609,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (readl(espi->mmio + SSPIIR) & SSPIIR_RORIS) {
/* clear the overrun interrupt */
writel(0, espi->mmio + SSPICR);
- dev_warn(&espi->pdev->dev,
+ dev_warn(&master->dev,
"receive overrun, aborting the message\n");
espi->current_msg->status = -EIO;
} else {
@@ -608,7 +617,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ep93xx_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
* Interrupt is either RX (RIS) or TX (TIS). For both cases we
* simply execute next data transfer.
*/
- if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(espi)) {
+ if (ep93xx_spi_read_write(master)) {
/*
* In normal case, there still is some processing left
* for current transfer. Let's wait for the next
@@ -815,7 +824,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
master->max_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / 2;
master->min_speed_hz = clk_get_rate(espi->clk) / (254 * 256);
- espi->pdev = pdev;
espi->sspdr_phys = res->start + SSPDR;
@@ -826,7 +834,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_spi_interrupt,
- 0, "ep93xx-spi", espi);
+ 0, "ep93xx-spi", master);
if (error) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n");
goto fail_release_master;
--
2.13.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists